Also, Mr. O,
I do not believe the word is "forbade." In the deed and the agreed upon settlement, the contract addresses "restricted," restricted land uses. Kind of like "restricted road fee money."
Restricted is fairly easy to understand. However, HPPOA feels they are entitled to interpret (change) meanings in whatever way that suits them- for example, restricted road fee money is now used for "so much more."
However, it seems the Watumull's aren't going to just allow HPPOA to interpret what they think restricted means when it comes to the deeds (must have come to a blow for HPPOA).
So yes, it will all be going to court, because HPPOA made a hot mess of everything.
And while YOU may "doubt" that any court would find that MBUs are not allowed because they are not commercial, and while HPPOA may not interpret MBUs to be commercial, it can also be argued that MBUs are definitely and specifically not parks, playgrounds, schools, or for recreational use.
BTW:
The multi million dollar investment Corp. (the Watumulls) and their "very competent lawyers" were not involved because of Nicole Craig. HPPOA brought them in. HPPOA is the 3rd party PLAINTIFF and the Watumull's are the 3rd party DEFENDANTS. Facts matter. It's not "blah."
I do not believe the word is "forbade." In the deed and the agreed upon settlement, the contract addresses "restricted," restricted land uses. Kind of like "restricted road fee money."
Restricted is fairly easy to understand. However, HPPOA feels they are entitled to interpret (change) meanings in whatever way that suits them- for example, restricted road fee money is now used for "so much more."
However, it seems the Watumull's aren't going to just allow HPPOA to interpret what they think restricted means when it comes to the deeds (must have come to a blow for HPPOA).
So yes, it will all be going to court, because HPPOA made a hot mess of everything.
And while YOU may "doubt" that any court would find that MBUs are not allowed because they are not commercial, and while HPPOA may not interpret MBUs to be commercial, it can also be argued that MBUs are definitely and specifically not parks, playgrounds, schools, or for recreational use.
BTW:
The multi million dollar investment Corp. (the Watumulls) and their "very competent lawyers" were not involved because of Nicole Craig. HPPOA brought them in. HPPOA is the 3rd party PLAINTIFF and the Watumull's are the 3rd party DEFENDANTS. Facts matter. It's not "blah."