11-02-2024, 08:37 PM
Grounds….that the county violated their charter by approving these subdivisions, by showing that these actions were for the sole purpose of making money for a select few with no intentions of the developments to ever be a benefit to the general public, and total disregard for the repercussions of their illegal actions (which continues to this day).
By showing that the class action rulings violate statutes (non-profits are not allowed to charge dues, fees or assessments to non-members), violate owners’ rights (Land Court recordation requires that all encumbrances be shown on the title), and by turning a blind eye to the violations of process (defendant class not being properly and adequately represented as required by law), and even assisting with those violations of process.
It’s actually pretty straight forward, and the foundation documents are readily available.
And please don’t mistake “taking over ownership” to mean “bringing the roads up to county standard”. I just want the responsibility to be where it belongs, and not something for us to argue about and sue each other.
By showing that the class action rulings violate statutes (non-profits are not allowed to charge dues, fees or assessments to non-members), violate owners’ rights (Land Court recordation requires that all encumbrances be shown on the title), and by turning a blind eye to the violations of process (defendant class not being properly and adequately represented as required by law), and even assisting with those violations of process.
It’s actually pretty straight forward, and the foundation documents are readily available.
And please don’t mistake “taking over ownership” to mean “bringing the roads up to county standard”. I just want the responsibility to be where it belongs, and not something for us to argue about and sue each other.