11-06-2024, 04:08 AM
Aloha Mr. O,
I am not understanding what you are referring to or why you are referring to an older reply from TomK. Unless, you are noting that this post has morphed well past just the occurrence of the HPPOA owner/member meeting.
Still, I feel the title is relevant. What was pushed on Owners/members at their meeting (rushing through bylaw amendments) should still be addressed. The board's indifference to the Cultural Preservation Site study (have you seen any discussion of it?) is still concerning. The Watumull's are obviously of importance and interest (BTW I found those minutes some of the board supporters have been waving about. The date was incorrect- the committee signed them 2016, should have been 2018. Regardless, they are still mailbox committee minutes, not BOD minutes).
If you need more order, so that you can research, please let me know. I am always happy to help.
I am not understanding what you are referring to or why you are referring to an older reply from TomK. Unless, you are noting that this post has morphed well past just the occurrence of the HPPOA owner/member meeting.
Still, I feel the title is relevant. What was pushed on Owners/members at their meeting (rushing through bylaw amendments) should still be addressed. The board's indifference to the Cultural Preservation Site study (have you seen any discussion of it?) is still concerning. The Watumull's are obviously of importance and interest (BTW I found those minutes some of the board supporters have been waving about. The date was incorrect- the committee signed them 2016, should have been 2018. Regardless, they are still mailbox committee minutes, not BOD minutes).
If you need more order, so that you can research, please let me know. I am always happy to help.