Don’t know what to tell you Patricia. In as much as I can’t speak for Moderator2, I don’t have a problem with, nor could care less who any poster is in real life, inclusive of M2. It does not matter what Kane said, it broke the rules.
Quite frankly, I am sick and tired of this “hiding behind” crap consistently being stated on public forums. I’ve even seen posts from posters here on PunaWeb who use a nom de plume chastising other posters who also use a nom de plume for “hiding behind” a nom de plume! If you want to publish your own personal information, go for it. (as long as it's in accordance with the forums rules about disclosure of personal information) I, as well as quite a few others, don’t. Nor should a moderator of ANY public forum need to state who they are.
What matters to me is uniform, fair, balanced and consistent moderation.
Try posting a foul, vulgar, sexually oriented or disclosing a person's personal information (doxing) on Facebook. You don’t get an email from Zuckerberg telling you what’s wrong, the post gets deleted. Period. Same with YouTube, Instagram et al. And it gets deleted by someone simply known as “System.”
If you look back a few months ago an entire thread was created asking Rob about moderating PunaWeb much better. It’s full of disgusting comments from hosts of the same posters asking, begging, pleading and demanding for this moderation, and now that that moderation is in effect, are really quite upset!
Go figure!
And, as hard as I try to wrap my head around this, but how does a poster using a nom de plume be defamed?
At any event, keep it clean and follow the rules!
ETA: The title of this thread is: "Moderator 2 needs Robs moderation" - so if it was Rob himself who did everything M2 did exactly the same way with respect to this entire debacle, it would then be OK?
ETA2: Speaking of hiding behind and all that, why do you have your status set to the "hidden" mode?
Quite frankly, I am sick and tired of this “hiding behind” crap consistently being stated on public forums. I’ve even seen posts from posters here on PunaWeb who use a nom de plume chastising other posters who also use a nom de plume for “hiding behind” a nom de plume! If you want to publish your own personal information, go for it. (as long as it's in accordance with the forums rules about disclosure of personal information) I, as well as quite a few others, don’t. Nor should a moderator of ANY public forum need to state who they are.
What matters to me is uniform, fair, balanced and consistent moderation.
Try posting a foul, vulgar, sexually oriented or disclosing a person's personal information (doxing) on Facebook. You don’t get an email from Zuckerberg telling you what’s wrong, the post gets deleted. Period. Same with YouTube, Instagram et al. And it gets deleted by someone simply known as “System.”
If you look back a few months ago an entire thread was created asking Rob about moderating PunaWeb much better. It’s full of disgusting comments from hosts of the same posters asking, begging, pleading and demanding for this moderation, and now that that moderation is in effect, are really quite upset!
Go figure!
And, as hard as I try to wrap my head around this, but how does a poster using a nom de plume be defamed?
At any event, keep it clean and follow the rules!
ETA: The title of this thread is: "Moderator 2 needs Robs moderation" - so if it was Rob himself who did everything M2 did exactly the same way with respect to this entire debacle, it would then be OK?
ETA2: Speaking of hiding behind and all that, why do you have your status set to the "hidden" mode?