Moderator 2 needs Robs moderation.

[Patricia]

Sorry but your original post of the attorney's correspondence had that info and it wasn't redacted.

By the way that letter from the attorney has to do with you posting information that was not yet in the public domain.
It was brought up in a court of law.
You got that info from someone who wasn't supposed to have that information and it was illegal for anyone to post that on information on Facebook.

You are CONFUSED. The info I posted is an email written to me. It is harassment, sent from one of the HPPOA attorneys and has absolutely NOTHING to do with "public domain." It was personally sent to me, to intimidate, and I can personally do whatever I wish with it. NOTE: Notice to Patricia Ruppert

---

Mr. O. I thought this post was supposed to be about Kane, Moderaror 2's judgement, and the difference between moderation and censorship.

I did not realize Moderator 2, referring to the removal of an email, written to me (not a public domain document) with info redacted, would result in this interruption.

So, back to Kane's post- are we allowed to briefly mention what it was about? (No names)