(01-10-2025, 03:19 AM)Patricia Wrote: HiloJulie, you appear to take everything I say, for some reason, as a personal affront. Should prospective buyers, or current owners who are looking at or have property in substandard subdivisions in Puna, Hawaii, not have the information I posted?
And you "assume" wrongly. But then that is the problem with assumptions.
Hope this isn't too "convoluted" for you.
A while back, I said I was no longer going to reply to you, but I broke my own rule and went ahead and tried to have a dialog and discussion with you.
So, in that light, yes, I “assum(ed) wrongly.
Nothing I have ever said past or present has or is a personal affront to you.
I do understand why you feel that way, since your only motivation is to argue, and I challenge that argument, which you think is a personal affront.
I also noticed on another thread you posted a while back, but you were questioning the building of 2 or more ADU’s on certain lots.
So, to me, it seems you are more or less a “control freak” who desires only to regulate what everyone else can do, but you yourself, refuse to be regulated.
Since you did not answer any one of the questions I have asked, continued discussion with you is pointless.
Have fun fighting your fight! Only a truly convoluted person would enjoy doing what your seemingly love doing!
No need to reply!
ETA: Anyone buying a home or property (which in today's dollars is 300k, 400k, 500k and you DO NOT KNOW what you're getting yourself into, understanding each caveat, each term, each contractual point by point by your own investigation and due diligence, then you deserve what you get (or got).
ETA2: Any verbal agreement is WORTH the piece of paper it SHOULD have been written on.
"Make Orwell Fiction Again"