01-13-2025, 11:03 PM
(01-13-2025, 10:11 PM)My 2 cents Wrote: ...I’m just mentioning this because this is what HPPOA will be faced with in this part of their court case. They will have to show some kind of legal foundation for their use of road money for non-road items that supports that bylaw. Maybe there’s something that I’m not aware of.
This is not about the need for mailboxes. I don’t think anyone is disputing that. It’s more about proper process, and terms and conditions being followed.
Perhaps it could be argued that the availability of these mailboxes reduces miles driven on HPP roads, thereby reducing road repairs. Anything that works to get people out of their cars is a win for a subdivision IMO.