PATRICIA PLEASE GO AWAY !!!
So... Is this the new tactic? Try to get this post "closed down?" There are currently over 13,500 views on this post. Why do you feel that is?
The 2018 "issue" was never resolved and is tied to the current issues (the use of restricted road fee money for non-road projects and the illegal dissolution of the prior BLC).
As is very evident (and again all anyone has to do is read) that anytime an HPPOA board feels owners wishes will conflict with their agenda the HPPOA board will stall, block, and eventually take over and squash ANY "dissent" (in the case of the "members BLC," VALID work).
What the board did in 2018 was illegal. And the current board is following in those same footsteps-
As:
"If a membership passed a motion at a meeting that, according to the bylaws, should have been carried out by the board but was ignored, this constitutes a violation of the bylaws and could potentially lead to
legal action against the board members, as bylaws are legally binding documents that govern the organization's operations."
"That's it. It's views you're after, even if you don't know the difference between a post and a thread. You are one sad sack."
I am not "after" anything except informing other owners (of all the substandard subdivisions) that they have rights. And that perhaps they may want to start paying MORE attention to what some of these subdivision "associations" and their boards are doing.
My pointing out "the views" is simply saying that it APPEARS that there are others who may be concerned/interested as well.
Oh, and thanks for educating me on the difference between "post" and "thread."
So... Is this the new tactic? Try to get this post "closed down?" There are currently over 13,500 views on this post. Why do you feel that is?
The 2018 "issue" was never resolved and is tied to the current issues (the use of restricted road fee money for non-road projects and the illegal dissolution of the prior BLC).
As is very evident (and again all anyone has to do is read) that anytime an HPPOA board feels owners wishes will conflict with their agenda the HPPOA board will stall, block, and eventually take over and squash ANY "dissent" (in the case of the "members BLC," VALID work).
What the board did in 2018 was illegal. And the current board is following in those same footsteps-
As:
"If a membership passed a motion at a meeting that, according to the bylaws, should have been carried out by the board but was ignored, this constitutes a violation of the bylaws and could potentially lead to
legal action against the board members, as bylaws are legally binding documents that govern the organization's operations."
"That's it. It's views you're after, even if you don't know the difference between a post and a thread. You are one sad sack."
I am not "after" anything except informing other owners (of all the substandard subdivisions) that they have rights. And that perhaps they may want to start paying MORE attention to what some of these subdivision "associations" and their boards are doing.
My pointing out "the views" is simply saying that it APPEARS that there are others who may be concerned/interested as well.
Oh, and thanks for educating me on the difference between "post" and "thread."