Those Facebook Groups all got deleted when she got a registered letter from HPPOA'S attorney telling her not to close any of her social media accounts because they could be used in the ongoing court case.
Obie, Obie, Obie, your statement is so false.
I did receive a letter from Barron Oda, by email. His "registered letter" was apparently lost, and I did answer the email.
There was nothing said, in Barron Oda's email about "nasty." It was a "request" to preserve evidence. I say it was a request as I was never SERVED with anything.
Here is my partial answer. I addressed his entire, long letter. But it is long, so will just post the following:
To Mr. Oda and board members, if there is anything else you would care to present about me, to the Court, please be advised that I am more than willing to help you. In fact, I am more than willing to tell the Court what I know, everything I know (emphasis added) where I received my information/documentation from, and just how much of that documentation and information I have shared with you. The Court may also be interested in the responses from some of you, that my sharing generated.
Will I reconsider posting about HPPOA dysfunction to social media platforms? No. Even though some of the board backers have tried to have me voted off committees, because I refused to agree to not post about HPPOA matters and meetings (talk about “chilling”).
Submitting my name and screenshot posts to the Court will not deter me either. In fact, Mr. Oda and board? Please feel free to take a screenshot of this post and share it with the Court.
Not too long after all of that, I did take down my FB pages, where I had posted a lot of documentation that apparently HPPOA does not have (probably because HPPOA boards have shredded it). I took down my FB pages, because I was tired of the velocirapotors circling AND, quite frankly, I did not want HPPOA to have easy access to my research (not my fault if HPPOA destroys their own docs).
I also took down my website, for the same reasons as above. In addition, I have to pay for the website. I did not remove "nasty" info. Unless you feel allowing people to read court docs is "nasty." And if you look, those have not been removed. The website is pretty much the same as it was. Except, now I tell HPP Owners that they are not required to be HPPOA members- something HPPOA is supposed to do but does not.
Obie, Obie, Obie, your statement is so false.
I did receive a letter from Barron Oda, by email. His "registered letter" was apparently lost, and I did answer the email.
There was nothing said, in Barron Oda's email about "nasty." It was a "request" to preserve evidence. I say it was a request as I was never SERVED with anything.
Here is my partial answer. I addressed his entire, long letter. But it is long, so will just post the following:
To Mr. Oda and board members, if there is anything else you would care to present about me, to the Court, please be advised that I am more than willing to help you. In fact, I am more than willing to tell the Court what I know, everything I know (emphasis added) where I received my information/documentation from, and just how much of that documentation and information I have shared with you. The Court may also be interested in the responses from some of you, that my sharing generated.
Will I reconsider posting about HPPOA dysfunction to social media platforms? No. Even though some of the board backers have tried to have me voted off committees, because I refused to agree to not post about HPPOA matters and meetings (talk about “chilling”).
Submitting my name and screenshot posts to the Court will not deter me either. In fact, Mr. Oda and board? Please feel free to take a screenshot of this post and share it with the Court.
Not too long after all of that, I did take down my FB pages, where I had posted a lot of documentation that apparently HPPOA does not have (probably because HPPOA boards have shredded it). I took down my FB pages, because I was tired of the velocirapotors circling AND, quite frankly, I did not want HPPOA to have easy access to my research (not my fault if HPPOA destroys their own docs).
I also took down my website, for the same reasons as above. In addition, I have to pay for the website. I did not remove "nasty" info. Unless you feel allowing people to read court docs is "nasty." And if you look, those have not been removed. The website is pretty much the same as it was. Except, now I tell HPP Owners that they are not required to be HPPOA members- something HPPOA is supposed to do but does not.