I do not believe in throwing out unsubstantiated claims. Which is why I have never been one of the many who have, in past years, accused staff/board members of benefiting themselves at the cost of HPP Owners, using road fee money. I do not engage in "conspiracy theories."
Facts require researched information to back them up. And YES, information can be incorrect, which then leads to more research and more information. However, some of you just stating, unequivocally, without anything to back your statements up, that what I am saying is untrue is not truth. It is EXACTLY what HOTPE said it is, "holding someone in check." It is not "incorrect information" you are worried about. It is FACTS for which you have no information to refute them. Do your research.
Only a judge will finally decide. If s/he rules against your interpretation of the bylaws you will say even the judge is wrong.
So... Using that argument, I suppose we should all just sit back and not discuss anything? Not read anything. Not research anything. Not KNOW anything.
Sure, judges wield a lot of power. But judges are people, just like everyone else. The more information that is made available for people (including judges) the better.
The historical information- court orders, successive bylaw changes that have occurred and why, over the course of HPPOA's 50 year history, are accurate. The accounts are not false. They are not incorrect. The accounts are written and documented. I did not write them. I did not interpret them.
Facts require researched information to back them up. And YES, information can be incorrect, which then leads to more research and more information. However, some of you just stating, unequivocally, without anything to back your statements up, that what I am saying is untrue is not truth. It is EXACTLY what HOTPE said it is, "holding someone in check." It is not "incorrect information" you are worried about. It is FACTS for which you have no information to refute them. Do your research.
Only a judge will finally decide. If s/he rules against your interpretation of the bylaws you will say even the judge is wrong.
So... Using that argument, I suppose we should all just sit back and not discuss anything? Not read anything. Not research anything. Not KNOW anything.
Sure, judges wield a lot of power. But judges are people, just like everyone else. The more information that is made available for people (including judges) the better.
The historical information- court orders, successive bylaw changes that have occurred and why, over the course of HPPOA's 50 year history, are accurate. The accounts are not false. They are not incorrect. The accounts are written and documented. I did not write them. I did not interpret them.