They're not "mine" Punatang, they're authors who mentioned the same study in the opening paragraphs of their article. I'm sure the goats would win the Pepsi emissions challenge against any conventional lawnmower. You're the one going on about how cows are needed - they're not, and they cause more emissions than their contributions to the land ultimately capture. Just actually read the study instead of reflexively attacking.
Again, don't have a cow, have a goat or sheep instead and you can still get milk/wool, meat, soil health, and climate mitigation benefits. If that's actually the goal and you're not just a after story to tell yourself to justify preferred choices. As you've been told before - follow the science!
Nuke away Mod.
Again, don't have a cow, have a goat or sheep instead and you can still get milk/wool, meat, soil health, and climate mitigation benefits. If that's actually the goal and you're not just a after story to tell yourself to justify preferred choices. As you've been told before - follow the science!
Nuke away Mod.