Julie - Good luck Tam! You got my vote!
FYI, Hawai'i House District 4 Map vs Hawai'i House District 3 Map
Good luck Todd instead? ;)
Fiend - Green was correct that Roberts' now deleted report was "baloney".
So if the UHERO solar report (that is being reviewed and re-worked) is "baloney" then what is the LNG report that doesn't include the cost of LNG - spam? (and not even da kine spam, more like the inedible Spam Lite flavor) Maybe HECO can put out a report boosting their plans for their bio-fuel conversion project that doesn't mention the unique mix of costs for biofuels or their land requirements, and it can be called Portuguese sausage, and we'll have a full breakfast plate special!
Obviously simplifying the complexities of energy generation down to processed food equivalents is silly and juvenile, but I guess you got to meat the voters where they're at. ;)
As the UHERO folks don't appear to be paid supporters for a particular project, you might be able to take them at their word that "we are correcting those [errors] too, in the open, because the standard is accuracy, not advocacy,” Roberts said in a written statement shared with HPR."
Or maybe they're all corrupt and on the take, as is the style of the time, and people can just roll their own power solutions (solar = easy; LNG/bio-fuel/geothermal/nuclear = a bit more tricky) and not have to argue over the best pork barrels-of-polluting-fuel project to endorse.
FYI, Hawai'i House District 4 Map vs Hawai'i House District 3 Map
Good luck Todd instead? ;)
Fiend - Green was correct that Roberts' now deleted report was "baloney".
So if the UHERO solar report (that is being reviewed and re-worked) is "baloney" then what is the LNG report that doesn't include the cost of LNG - spam? (and not even da kine spam, more like the inedible Spam Lite flavor) Maybe HECO can put out a report boosting their plans for their bio-fuel conversion project that doesn't mention the unique mix of costs for biofuels or their land requirements, and it can be called Portuguese sausage, and we'll have a full breakfast plate special!
Obviously simplifying the complexities of energy generation down to processed food equivalents is silly and juvenile, but I guess you got to meat the voters where they're at. ;)
As the UHERO folks don't appear to be paid supporters for a particular project, you might be able to take them at their word that "we are correcting those [errors] too, in the open, because the standard is accuracy, not advocacy,” Roberts said in a written statement shared with HPR."
Or maybe they're all corrupt and on the take, as is the style of the time, and people can just roll their own power solutions (solar = easy; LNG/bio-fuel/geothermal/nuclear = a bit more tricky) and not have to argue over the best pork barrels-of-polluting-fuel project to endorse.