10-29-2007, 11:11 AM
Glad you are here to post your point of view.
For my part I must say that one of your arguments is lost on me. I can't quite accept the "thirty five vacation rentals are illegal so my illegal operation should be okay too". I don't see the 35 wrongs make a right. I believe that any and all traffic there is likely illegal. The pressure of people will trample every "keep off the grass" sign every time.
The situation is complex and the complexity is increased with the addition of tour buses. I don't think your tour buses are the worst thing that happens, it's not the best thing either. The pond is a rapidly depreciating asset. Speeding that depreciation would not be one of my goals.
Meanwhile our own rapidly expanding population is quite capable of dooming this wonderful location with or without tour buses.
So when do we each decide if we are part of the problem or part of the solution?
For my part I must say that one of your arguments is lost on me. I can't quite accept the "thirty five vacation rentals are illegal so my illegal operation should be okay too". I don't see the 35 wrongs make a right. I believe that any and all traffic there is likely illegal. The pressure of people will trample every "keep off the grass" sign every time.
The situation is complex and the complexity is increased with the addition of tour buses. I don't think your tour buses are the worst thing that happens, it's not the best thing either. The pond is a rapidly depreciating asset. Speeding that depreciation would not be one of my goals.
Meanwhile our own rapidly expanding population is quite capable of dooming this wonderful location with or without tour buses.
So when do we each decide if we are part of the problem or part of the solution?
Assume the best and ask questions.
Punaweb moderator
Punaweb moderator