10-31-2007, 06:31 AM
thanks Bob for the cite ..
I got busy after I asked you for it, will read it this week.
My question that you answered with the cite:
"Where does the entitlement to see amazing views from overhead come into our laws and become stronger than the right to enjoy private property?" wasn't referring to air space ownership.
It referred to rights to enjoy property vs. "touring" rights.
I think there SHOULD be distinguishing between aviation that TRANSPORTS people from Point A to Point B and overflights that are commercial tours rather than transport. I know -- SHOULD is perhaps wishful thinking.
This "right" to view scenery from the air, it bothers me. Homeowners under common law have no rights to view even after paying millions for their property ... so where does this "right to view for the price of a helo ticket" appear in our laws? Curious.
Thanks again for the citation. Will read it as you suggested ... I'm an analytical reader not an emotional reader.
I got busy after I asked you for it, will read it this week.
My question that you answered with the cite:
"Where does the entitlement to see amazing views from overhead come into our laws and become stronger than the right to enjoy private property?" wasn't referring to air space ownership.
It referred to rights to enjoy property vs. "touring" rights.
I think there SHOULD be distinguishing between aviation that TRANSPORTS people from Point A to Point B and overflights that are commercial tours rather than transport. I know -- SHOULD is perhaps wishful thinking.
This "right" to view scenery from the air, it bothers me. Homeowners under common law have no rights to view even after paying millions for their property ... so where does this "right to view for the price of a helo ticket" appear in our laws? Curious.
Thanks again for the citation. Will read it as you suggested ... I'm an analytical reader not an emotional reader.