01-07-2008, 09:57 AM
Janeadams,
I'm not against curbside recycling. What I am against is the State double dipping and charging us twice for things.
According to this file the unredeemed deposits are suppose to pay for the recycling program.
There are many "Property Owners" that don't even live on the land and/or live in there houses. Why should the Owners be stuck with the bill from the recycling that there "Tenants" generated?
Why should we pay $.06 per bottle for a recycling program...and then get charged again in Property Taxes?
I have nothing against recycling, however, the way that the State is Running this program seems very wishy washy.
And as far as the statement that no one is getting rich off of this, well truth be in told, the Recycling Centers are getting very rich off of this.
-----------------
Coming home soon!
I'm not against curbside recycling. What I am against is the State double dipping and charging us twice for things.
According to this file the unredeemed deposits are suppose to pay for the recycling program.
There are many "Property Owners" that don't even live on the land and/or live in there houses. Why should the Owners be stuck with the bill from the recycling that there "Tenants" generated?
Why should we pay $.06 per bottle for a recycling program...and then get charged again in Property Taxes?
I have nothing against recycling, however, the way that the State is Running this program seems very wishy washy.
And as far as the statement that no one is getting rich off of this, well truth be in told, the Recycling Centers are getting very rich off of this.
-----------------
Coming home soon!