07-03-2008, 07:36 AM
Hello Tiffany,
I am sorry that I reacted badly to your call this morning. I will try to assume that you were not personally involved in Emily's performance at the Planning Committee on July 1. You are her legislative assistant so it is easy to make assumptions. So feel free to clarify your involvement in the lack of process at the Planning Committee meeting. Meanwhile I apologize to you but I did not create this aggravation. Emily did.
To circumvent the purpose of the meeting and waste the time of everyone who appeared that day was insulting and amateurish. It was, frankly, an embarrassing performance and needs some explanation.
Meanwhile I would ask you to address the 2nd half of my emailed request.
... could you identify those in the community who she consulted on this?
Rob Tucker
I am sorry that I reacted badly to your call this morning. I will try to assume that you were not personally involved in Emily's performance at the Planning Committee on July 1. You are her legislative assistant so it is easy to make assumptions. So feel free to clarify your involvement in the lack of process at the Planning Committee meeting. Meanwhile I apologize to you but I did not create this aggravation. Emily did.
To circumvent the purpose of the meeting and waste the time of everyone who appeared that day was insulting and amateurish. It was, frankly, an embarrassing performance and needs some explanation.
Meanwhile I would ask you to address the 2nd half of my emailed request.
... could you identify those in the community who she consulted on this?
Rob Tucker
Assume the best and ask questions.
Punaweb moderator
Punaweb moderator