08-25-2008, 10:13 AM
I understand Jerry, It has taken me fifteen years to accept the fact that Hawaii is as ethically oriented as it is. But it is.
Meanwhile, unless we are voting for an incumbent or candidate with previous similar office experience I think we have to rationally assume that they will be learning on the job (or not) and growing into the position (or not). Both Wayne and Kale show a need to grow into the job. Wayne is behind the curve (in my opinion) on issues and Kale is perhaps behind the curve on technique (in James W.'s opinion). Not all issues can be determined by ethical calculations. My case in point on the referendum illustrates that. I spent a couple months waiting to see how Wayne handled issues. Meanwhile I watched Kale get better and better at technique.
Then I made my decision. I am not planning to wait till the day before voting to support a candidate.
Meanwhile I do not choose Kale Gumapac merely because he is a native Hawaiian man. It is a factor though. I witnessed a substantial groundswell of pride locally when Emily Naeole was elected. That pride was a good thing but has been impacted by events over twenty months. I would prefer, all other things being even (and they are not), to see increased interest, focus and involvement in our community and try to attempt a "bringing together" to combat Emily's Naeole's repeated declarations of "The haoles are being mean to me". Emily contributes to divisiveness. Kale contributes to cohesiveness.
That's my point of view. A bit complex perhaps but Puna is a complex place.
Kale Gumapac for Council District 5
Punaweb moderator
Meanwhile, unless we are voting for an incumbent or candidate with previous similar office experience I think we have to rationally assume that they will be learning on the job (or not) and growing into the position (or not). Both Wayne and Kale show a need to grow into the job. Wayne is behind the curve (in my opinion) on issues and Kale is perhaps behind the curve on technique (in James W.'s opinion). Not all issues can be determined by ethical calculations. My case in point on the referendum illustrates that. I spent a couple months waiting to see how Wayne handled issues. Meanwhile I watched Kale get better and better at technique.
Then I made my decision. I am not planning to wait till the day before voting to support a candidate.
Meanwhile I do not choose Kale Gumapac merely because he is a native Hawaiian man. It is a factor though. I witnessed a substantial groundswell of pride locally when Emily Naeole was elected. That pride was a good thing but has been impacted by events over twenty months. I would prefer, all other things being even (and they are not), to see increased interest, focus and involvement in our community and try to attempt a "bringing together" to combat Emily's Naeole's repeated declarations of "The haoles are being mean to me". Emily contributes to divisiveness. Kale contributes to cohesiveness.
That's my point of view. A bit complex perhaps but Puna is a complex place.
Kale Gumapac for Council District 5
Punaweb moderator
Assume the best and ask questions.
Punaweb moderator
Punaweb moderator