09-02-2008, 12:18 PM
My opinion is Hunter is in the bag for Billy Kenoi.
Your opinion is Hunter Bishop is not in the bag for Billy Kenoi.
My opinion is you are either also in the Billy bag OR you're a fool blinded by the aura of "The Great One".
You say you aren't in the Billy Bag and you have an objective view of all this.
OK, have you ever heard the old saying that opinions are like a**holes, everybody has one? Well if you haven't, it pretty much sums up our differences and, no matter how much either of us rant, only time will tell which one of us is right.
However, regardless of the Hunter issue, because you have already censored my posts on your blog, and have TWICE threatened to have me censored on pubaweb, it occurs to me you have demonstrated PRECISELY why people choose to remain anonymous when presenting ideas others find disagreeable. If you knew who I am what would you do? Call me on the phone and threaten me maybe? Or maybe give me a couple flat tires? Or...? In short, as you demonstrate with YOUR actions, some people can't be trusted to act rationally, so anonymity is a REASONABLE requirement for anyone distributing an inconvenient truth.
Your opinion is Hunter Bishop is not in the bag for Billy Kenoi.
My opinion is you are either also in the Billy bag OR you're a fool blinded by the aura of "The Great One".
You say you aren't in the Billy Bag and you have an objective view of all this.
OK, have you ever heard the old saying that opinions are like a**holes, everybody has one? Well if you haven't, it pretty much sums up our differences and, no matter how much either of us rant, only time will tell which one of us is right.
However, regardless of the Hunter issue, because you have already censored my posts on your blog, and have TWICE threatened to have me censored on pubaweb, it occurs to me you have demonstrated PRECISELY why people choose to remain anonymous when presenting ideas others find disagreeable. If you knew who I am what would you do? Call me on the phone and threaten me maybe? Or maybe give me a couple flat tires? Or...? In short, as you demonstrate with YOUR actions, some people can't be trusted to act rationally, so anonymity is a REASONABLE requirement for anyone distributing an inconvenient truth.