12-09-2008, 06:26 AM
I knew that the moment that I used the word homosexual I would be critiqued for my using that tiding. Just the use of that word enrages some because it is not a jubilant and rhapsodic word. So as not to offend, let me change my phrasing to this.
Frank Lefrandt 47 was arrested for sexually assaulting a 13 year old. During the investigation it was summerize that Frank’s sexual preference was young males. If that makes some more comfortable by not putting a label on poor Frank as a “homosexual degenerate” so be it. I stand politically corrected and agree that a child molester who abuses children should be brought to trial. That “person” who is convicted of molestation of a child should receive the “max” that the law will allow.
csgray wrote:
Do you mean to imply that a "heterosexual child molester" is more acceptable to you?
Carol, why would you make a statement like that? Do you actually believe that any form of child molestation is appropriate to me? The rest of your argument is extremely valid and I agree with you whole heartedly.
The Lack
Frank Lefrandt 47 was arrested for sexually assaulting a 13 year old. During the investigation it was summerize that Frank’s sexual preference was young males. If that makes some more comfortable by not putting a label on poor Frank as a “homosexual degenerate” so be it. I stand politically corrected and agree that a child molester who abuses children should be brought to trial. That “person” who is convicted of molestation of a child should receive the “max” that the law will allow.
csgray wrote:
Do you mean to imply that a "heterosexual child molester" is more acceptable to you?
Carol, why would you make a statement like that? Do you actually believe that any form of child molestation is appropriate to me? The rest of your argument is extremely valid and I agree with you whole heartedly.
The Lack