10-07-2009, 02:54 AM
It seems to me as well there's a a fuzzy reading of 2cd Amendment rights to both "keep" and "bear". No sense in keeping if bearing is prohibited. I think this is where the Hawaii laws would come into question, but am unaware of any rulings that deal with that side of the issue. Obviously, it's easy to regulate allowing ownership but practically in all manner prohibiting usage, which is close to what we have here. I expect if challenged at a federal level the court would be obligated to see the manner in a similar light.
Any thoughts on that?
http://sensiblesimplicity.lefora.com/
Any thoughts on that?
http://sensiblesimplicity.lefora.com/