08-16-2008, 06:11 PM
Dear George... On my 5th and last post I'm able to post today....
Dang dude... wanna buy some viagra?
-------
blog
Dang dude... wanna buy some viagra?
-------
blog
|
Kenoi - Bar fight in 2004?
|
08-17-2008, 06:32 AM
quote:Why would I like to buy Viagra? I thought you were looking for some. Did you read the Trib this morning? Seems a shame to me that they only reported what Billy said and not what was in the Police Reports. For instance, Billy says he went to Shooters with a school teacher but there's nothing about Hayward, the guy who was arrested at the scene. That would be the Hayward who was convicted of terroristic threatening, criminal property damage and assault. I dunno, maybe he teaches school someplace.
08-17-2008, 04:52 PM
This is quoted by a commentator from Big Island Weekly.
These are good questions and makes you really think. Here is the quote: Concerned Citizen wrote on Aug 17, 2008 12:04 PM: " I posted some questions to Hunter Bishops blog but it has not been posted by him. So I post it here. If you really want to seek the truth, you should ask these honest questions. Billy Kenoi told West HI Today before the forum that he was in the wrong place at the wrong time and that he was breaking up a fight. At the forum, Billy said the fight started after a woman told him his barstool hit her. Was he breaking up a fight that he was in? Billy Kenoi admitted at the forum that he had "head contact" with the victim. The police report said that one victim told the police that it was a "head butt". The woman said she was hit over the head with that barstool. Did the prosecutor know about Billy's version when the prosecutor decided to dismiss the charges? If Billy had nothing to hide, why did the security tell the police that Billy ran out the back door after the police came? And, why did the prosecutor press the charges for almost two years then dimiss the charges? Why is that prosecutor who made the charges against Mr. Kenoi no longer with the prosecutor's office? Who are these two other witnesses who gave a different version from the victims? And, when did they go to the police and what did they say? Why did the prosecutor decide to believe these two witnesses version rather than the victims version? There are way too many unanswered questions about the character of this person seeking our vote to lead our county. We deserve honest answers. " localboy
localboy
08-23-2008, 05:23 AM
Billy's back is up against the wall over the incident at Shooters and as a result rumor has it the "Long Knives" will start to come out. We'll have to wait and see what happens. When this is over I think I might write a book.
Some of "The Saga of BK" is funny, some of it's scary. One of the funny parts was the Haari Boat races last weekend. Billy brought a crew of ringers, a physically intimidating group of young men who looked like they single handedly had consumed the island's complete annual supply of steroids. First race, paddles at the ready, boom, the race is on! Immediately Billy's boyz speedily paddled in a circle and sank like a rock. It was hysterical! What made it even funnier was that as his boat went down Billy abandoned both crew and ship and quickly swam to shore alone, leaving his crew clinging to the overturned boat. Well, his crew except for one guy who apparently couldn't swim and, as Billy gracefully swam ashore, had to be rescued by others. As Billy's boat was sinking and he was swimming away, someone mentioned to me that Billy's abandoning ship and swimming to shore alone was reminiscent of his exit out the back door at Shooters. An example of the scary parts are the comments (actually they were threats) made by Billy's crew after they sank. No class.
08-23-2008, 06:07 AM
BTW, I recently tried to post a message on Damon's blog where I noted that one of the people complaining about how the author of akamaivoters.com was anonymous was herself posting anonymously. Damon did not allow my post to be published on his blog. Soooo, I tried to post the same thing again, along with a question as to why he had omitted my prior post. You see, when Damon told everybody he was going to start moderating his blog he said it was because he was tired of people trying to sell him Viagra but it appears his real intent was to eliminate opinions and observations he doesn't want public.
Anyway, in response to my last attempt to post on his blog he emailed me the following: Damon -> don't you see I don't give a f**k what you say.... I responded with ->I know you don't. And that makes me think of the famous quote by Voltaire, "I may disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it". You obviously do not represent any form of enlightenment. Take this to heart dude, no matter how much you try to spin things your boy has cooked his own goose. You can refuse to print anything from anyone, and it won't change a thing. In fact all you accomplish is you demonstrate to people what your character really is, and that ain't so good lookin' right now.
08-23-2008, 07:20 AM
quote: What did Pilago do this time?[  ]------- blog
08-23-2008, 10:38 AM
What did Pilago do this time?[ ]------- blog [/quote] He actually runs the cleanest campaign in comparison to Higa, Inouye, and Bad Boy Kenoi. You can check out their reports here: https://nc.csc.hawaii.gov/CFSPublic/ReportList.php [  ]Pilago is sourced from the comminity 100%--not faking it.
08-24-2008, 04:28 AM
To Damon:
Your attempt to make light of your obvious bias won't get you very far... brah; in fact, it's pathetic. You're obviously in the bag for Billy and my suggestion is both you and Hunter go outside and wave to your credibility as it goes bye bye. To freddie: I don't get your drift. I've sifted through the campaign spending reports and found only one major problem on the part of three of the four candidates. Mr. Pilago is one of the three (yes, Billy was another, in fact the worst) who made the omission so I don't think he's all that heroic. Just to let you know, I called the Campaign Spending Commission and spoke to one of their attorney's a day or two before the last commission meeting but there wasn't enough time to get it on the agenda. My assumption is, at least in the case of Angel, that it's probably a relatively minor oversight. But, in the case of Billy, it could mean contributions and expenses have been significantly understated. Possibly in the range of $30,000 to $40,000, almost all of which would be in violation of the contribution limits. Regardless, so far it's in the hands of the spending commission so we'll see what they do. Aside from that the only thing I see in Mr. Pilago's reports in comparison the other three is he hasn't reported receiving many contributions. That means A) maybe he doesn't have much support or B) maybe he hasn't reported all the money he's received. My guess it's A but it's difficult to tell. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
]Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)