Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Ag - what really works to feed people
#1
Aloha,

This is pertinent to multiple WGs.
Land Use is one and is the only forum here actually being used.
From the UK Guardian, an article on how traditional/indigenous small-scale chemical-free non-industrial agriculture is in fact (still) the most efficient and most productive way to produce food.
To myself and some of you this has always been obvious.
To anyone living on a small island in the middle of a big ocean, it ought to at least be thought-provoking.
NOTE: the forum software appears to break this link (below) and not link it correctly.
You will probably need to copy and paste the entire link into your browser address bar to get it to work.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Articl...83,00.html

hi ho,
John S.



Edited by - johns on 01/02/2007 12:30:57
Reply
#2
Not exactly the answer you were looking for, but more food for thought.

Forwarding this information on to land use interests, just in from Eric Kapono of the Hawaii Rural Developent Council (HRDC).

The final report for their community outreach project is complete, and posted for all to explore. It is going to go to the Hawaii State Legislature, and so it will be useful for folks to know what is going on at that level, so everyone can be on the same page when it all comes down the pike. It looks like everyone already is, for the most part.

Thanks,
Kim




From: "Eric M. Kapono" <kapono@advancementservices.org> View Contact Details View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert
To: "Eric M. Kapono" <kapono@advancementservices.org>
CC: "Alan Murakami" <atmurakami@hawaii.rr.com>, "Brent Dillabaugh" <bdillabaugh@hacbed.org>
Subject: HRDC workshop Final Report for review -- E HI
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 14:04:22 -1000


Aloha a me ka hauoli makahiki hou ia kakou,

Our temporary website is updated again with our "Final Report" which
was
submitted to the Executive Officer of the Land Use Commission (LUC), on
December 21, 2006. The report contains all workshop products, as well
as
some background to and extrapolation from our public meetings. At the
site
below, you will be able to view, print or save PDF files showing the
Final
Report & other items from our events. At the bottom of the site, we
have
some other resources you may find helpful.
http://www.advancementservices.org/HRDC/index.htm

There is still no news to report on the "Statewide Meeting" to be
organized
by the LUC Executive Officer. The purpose of this meeting will be to
review
the outcomes from all the public meetings regarding Hawaii's Rural
District
designation, and begin to formulate recommendations for legislative
action.
It is hoped this meeting will occur prior to January 17, when the
Legislature convenes, however it is possible the meeting will occur
later
than that. As soon as we have news to report we will update our
website, so
please check our site again over the next week or two.

On behalf of Alan Murakami and the Hawaii Rural Development Council
(HRDC)
board of directors, mahalo for engaging in these important public
conversations and for making your contribution to a healthy & vibrant
community.

A hui hou,
~Eric

Eric M. Kapono
Advancement Services for Native Nonprofits
234 Nahale-a Avenue Hilo, HI 96720
Tel: 808-969-3991



Reply
#3
Greetings,

This island economy was founded in agriculture, subsistence farming, hunting, fishing and gathering. It has the ability to provide everything its residents need for a comfortable living. But right now the balance is being threatened by developments that are consuming land of the subsistence homesteader.

Since the farmers can basically take care of them selves by what they grow, raise or trade at the market, the real questions are how many more people should they be planning to feed? Will the local population be satisfied with local products, or will they want continue to want more options? Do we really need eggs that travel across the ocean so we can buy them? Seems like there’s a good market for Christmas trees, why doesn’t someone grow the doomed trees here instead of continually importing increasing numbers of them from overseas too? They are after all, a major cause for a great number of new agricultural and human pests introduced to our island every year. Ever get stung or mobbed by “yellow-jackets”? Thank Christmas trees from the Pacific Northwest.

Is it practical to grow animal feed here on the island, for island raised livestock and pets? If not, why? There’s got to be a way to make all of this work. We have all the pieces, just have to put them all together so they fit.
I don’t know why anyone needs to buy eggs that took an overseas trip, or pork butts with USDA ink on them, but there’s nobody really marketing for the local farmer who produces too much. People like to produce, process or sell, but generally don’t have time to them all. There aren’t enough farmers markets to even get fresh stuff out to all neighborhoods on a regular basis. There aren’t enough marketing opportunities (co-operatives?) to make a comfortable living off of all the hard work, and time investments. Economic opportunities? What must we get from overseas, and what can we do to change that?

Kim


Reply
#4
Another appropriate forward:

From: Na Maka o ka 'Aina

Subject: ISLANDS AT RISK - new video on genetic engineering in Hawai'i

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

ISLANDS AT RISK -
GENETIC ENGINEERING IN HAWAI'I

new video premieres on island public access channels in January

CONTACT:
Na Maka o ka `Aina
808.929.9659
namaka@interpac.net

The environmental law firm Earthjustice and the documentary team Na Maka o ka `Aina announce the television premiere of a new video entitled ISLANDS AT RISK – GENETIC ENGINEERING IN HAWAI'I. This half-hour program explores a subject that has received little attention in the media but that involves a potential public health and safety issue of enormous consequence.

Focusing on local experiments with genetically modified organisms (GMOs), the program features Hawai`i farmers, teachers, legal and medical experts and community activists who share their perspective on the genetic engineering of crops and the patenting of life forms.

“Hawai`i has been called the GMO testing capitol of the world because, in the past ten years or so, we have had here more than 2,000 field tests of experimental genetically-engineered crops in more than 6,000 locations around our small state,” says Earthjustice attorney Paul Achitoff in the video. “And this is more than any other place in the world.”

Earthjustice has won recent lawsuits in federal and state courts challenging the introduction of these experimental crop tests in the islands without first assessing the environmental and human health impacts.

ISLANDS AT RISK – GENETIC ENGINEERING IN HAWAI'I looks at some of the possible impacts, including allergic and immune system responses from exposure to biopharmaceutical crops—both in humans and in Hawai`i’s endangered species—and contamination of regular food crops such as papaya, taro, coffee and corn with genetically modified versions of those crops.

“Some people say it’s a tiny risk,” says Kaua`i taro farmer Chris Kobayashi in the video, “but it’s a huge risk.”

Some of that risk is described by medical doctor, public health officer and World Health Organization consultant Dr. Lorrin Pang of Maui who calls for more oversight of the genetic engineering industry. Regarding the substances introduced into the cells of GMO plants, Pang states, “These things are not benign. These things are quite unknown. The kinds of studies we do for drugs and vaccines are exactly what genetically-engineered food needs.”

Aside from health issues, the video focuses on the economics of the current state government policy of subsidizing the biotech industry. Local organic farmers growing coffee, papaya, taro and corn point out that genetically engineered produce does not command the export market prices of conventionally-grown and organic produce. Many countries either refuse to import GE food or require labeling. “We’re going in the wrong direction for economic development,” says international legal expert Mililani Trask of Hilo in the video. “We need to re-assess it.”

Trask also discusses the practice of patenting Hawaiian life forms, calling it a form of bio-piracy. “We Kanaka Maoli are claiming our inalienable right to the biodiversity of our lands. This is the heart of what we are in terms of our survival, our ability to maintain our health.”

The recent attempt by the University of Hawai`i to patent taro, honored as an ancestor of the Hawaiian people, is recounted in the video by Moloka`i hunter and Hawaiian activist Walter Ritte. His and others’ successful efforts to persuade the UH to drop their patents on new hybrid Hawaiian taro varieties was a signal to the whole biotechnology industry, Ritte says in the video, that “you cannot own our ancestors.”

The issue of food security and the world’s future ability to feed itself is discussed by Kona farmers Una Greenaway and Nancy Redfeather.

“By choosing the path of genetically-engineered agriculture, we are narrowing significantly the amount of seed varieties that are available to the farmer today,” says Redfeather.

Greenaway adds: “Biotech companies always claim this technology is there to feed the world. And I believe it’s exactly the opposite. When you have a GE crop, every single plant in that hundreds and hundreds of acres is exactly the same. So there is no more biodiversity.”

The video ends with a vision of Hawai`i as a model for sustainable tropical agriculture. “Hawai`i is a niche specialty market for amazing things: coffee, pineapple, banana, flowers. We can actually support ourselves with this,” says Kona mixed organic farmer Melanie Bondera.


The program was produced for Earthjustice by Joan Lander and Puhipau of the documentary production team Na Maka o ka `Aina, based on Hawai`i island. DVDs are available at www.namaka.com .


------

CABLE TELEVISION SCHEDULE

ISLANDS AT RISK – GENETIC ENGINEERING IN HAWAI'I
will premiere on public access channels throughout the islands
during the month of January according to the following schedule.

HAWAI'I ISLAND
Na Leo o Hawai'i - Channel 54
every Friday nite in January at 8 pm


MAUI
Akaku - Visions Channel 53
January 4, 7:00 pm
January 12, 5:30 pm
January 20, 9:00 pm
January 29, 5:00 pm


O'AHU
'Olelo - Channel 54
every Friday nite in January at 8 pm
Tuff Talk, hosted by Ruth Hsu, PhD, presents ISLANDS AT RISK
followed by interview with Paul Achitoff of Earthjustice
January 5, 8 pm
January 12, 8 pm
January 19, 8 pm
January 26, 8 pm

other ISLANDS AT RISK showings
'Olelo - Channel 52
January 4, 8:30 pm
January 11, 11 am
January 18, 8:30 pm


KAUA'I
to be announced

Reply
#5
We had similar experiences to those suggested by John's article on our family farm in Connecticut. In the '50s and '60's the federal government was in high gear to convince the small farmers to specialize (monoculture) and turn their pastures into field. Buy big expensive machinery with borrowed money. No till planting with lots of herbicides.

Our farm was the only one to not travel that route - too stubborn to listen to the "pros".

As the '60s turned into the '70s and '80s all our neighbors went bankrupt one by one and the land around us was largely bought up by insurance companies (they sat on the land and waiting for development demand).

At the end my elderly uncle was the last man standing and his farm was bought and preserved (land bank) because of the organic quality of his land. (What's "organic" he asked).

Anyway - our own family fable.
Assume the best and ask questions.

Punaweb moderator
Reply
#6
quote:
Since the farmers can basically take care of them selves by what they grow, raise or trade at the market, the real questions are how many more people should they be planning to feed?...
...There aren’t enough farmers markets to even get fresh stuff out to all neighborhoods on a regular basis. There aren’t enough marketing opportunities (co-operatives?) to make a comfortable living off of all the hard work, and time investments.



The two fundamental problems are access to land and price of food.

In the USA we pay the smallest percentage of our incomes for food of pretty much any people in the world. Yes, the whole world, first, second and third.
We expect - demand in fact - that food to be cheap.
We are not aware of the massive subsidies we pay in various ways that make it so seemingly "cheap."
And, we are not (yet) willing to pay what it actually costs for people to make a decent and regenerative living growing food (or fiber etc.) locally for us.

Also, we have no legal means or tools - and so far no cultural will - to actually make land necessary for feeding, clothing and housing ourselves - in perpetuity and outside our speculative resort/housing "real estate" market - available in our communities.
So land is priced for the speculative resort/housing market and is not affordable for local ag/forestry uses.

Combine our addiction to offshore "cheap" with our land speculation for external markets ("selling the farm," literally) and it seems pretty obvious why localized food/fiber production is not presently economically viable.

Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)