Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 2.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Big Island Organizations & Programs Losing Funding
Yes the effects of human consumption are often nothing short of heartbreaking.  Still yet, people eat fish and they all come from somewhere and that place probably has dolphins and turtles too.

Please forgive my laziness with an AI (grok) search to try to provide a basic answer your question about "how this affects the fishermen who work out of Hilo harbor."  Please take it with a grain of salt (I recommend  Pure Kona Deep Sea Salt available at https://www.bigislandlocavorestore.com/).  Like you, I am eager to see the real results here in human and fish terms, when all of the dust settles.

FROM GROK: 

Hilo fishermen, operating on the Big Island of Hawaii, stand to benefit from President Donald Trump’s executive orders and proclamations signed on April 17, 2025, in ways similar to Hawaii’s broader fishing industry, but with some considerations specific to their location and operations. Below is a focused analysis of how these measures could impact Hilo’s fishing community, based on available information:
1. [b]Access to Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument (PRIMNM)[/b]
  • Proclamation Impact: The proclamation opens commercial fishing in the PRIMNM, a 400,000-square-mile area southwest of Hawaii, from 50 to 200 nautical miles within its boundaries.
  • Benefit for Hilo Fishermen: Hilo’s fishing fleet, which includes longline vessels targeting tuna and other pelagic species, gains access to previously restricted waters closer to Hawaii. This reduces travel time and fuel costs compared to fishing in distant international waters, which can take four to seven days to reach from Hilo’s port. Shorter trips mean lower operational costs and fresher catches, boosting profitability.
  • Economic Impact: Hilo’s fishing industry, while smaller than Honolulu’s $110 million market, supports local markets, restaurants, and processing. Increased access to productive fishing grounds could enhance catch volumes, benefiting small-scale and commercial fishermen who rely on Hilo’s port infrastructure.
2. [b]Executive Order on Seafood Competitiveness[/b]
  • Regulatory Relief: The executive order directs the Secretary of Commerce to identify and reduce burdensome regulations within 30 days, working with Regional Fishery Management Councils. This targets restrictive catch limits, outdated data practices, and other barriers to productivity.
  • Specific Benefits for Hilo:
    • Streamlined Regulations: Hilo fishermen, who often face strict quotas and seasonal restrictions under the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council, could see more flexible catch limits or extended fishing seasons. This is critical for small-boat operators in Hilo, who have less capacity to absorb regulatory constraints.
    • Modernized Management: The order mandates the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) to adopt better technologies and cooperative research for fishery assessments. Improved data collection could lead to more accurate stock assessments for species like bigeye tuna, a key catch for Hilo’s longline fleet, potentially increasing quotas.
    • Permit Expansion: Expanded exempted fishing permit programs may allow Hilo fishermen to access new fisheries or experimental fishing opportunities, diversifying their catch and income sources.
  • Local Advantage: Hilo’s proximity to deep-sea fishing grounds makes it a strategic hub for implementing these changes, potentially attracting more investment in local processing or vessel maintenance.
3. [b]Economic and Trade Support[/b]
  • Combating Foreign Competition: The executive order addresses the U.S.’s $20 billion seafood trade deficit by reviewing programs like the Seafood Import Monitoring Program (SIMP) to counter illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing by foreign fleets, particularly from China. Hilo fishermen, who compete with imported seafood in local and mainland markets, could benefit from a more level playing field.
  • Local Market Boost: Increased domestic seafood production could drive demand for Hilo-caught fish in local markets like the Hilo Farmers Market or through direct sales to restaurants, supporting the Big Island’s economy.
4. [b]Potential for Further Monument Openings[/b]
  • Papahānaumokuākea Review: The executive order includes a review of other marine national monuments, such as Papahānaumokuākea, which spans 528,000 square miles around the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. If opened to commercial fishing, this could significantly expand fishing grounds accessible from Hilo, though it’s farther from the Big Island than from Honolulu.
  • Hilo-Specific Considerations: Hilo’s smaller fleet may rely more on nearshore or intermediate-range fishing, so the benefits of Papahānaumokuākea’s opening would depend on vessel capacity and infrastructure to support longer trips.
Hilo-Specific Context and Challenges
  • Fleet Composition: Hilo’s fishing community includes a mix of longline vessels, small-boat fishermen, and artisanal operators. Longliners will benefit most from access to PRIMNM and potential regulatory relief, while small-boat fishermen may see indirect benefits through improved local market dynamics or permit expansions.
  • Infrastructure Limitations: Hilo’s port, while significant, has less capacity than Honolulu’s, which handles 80% of Hawaii’s commercial catch. Investments in docking, cold storage, or processing facilities may be needed to fully capitalize on increased catches.
Stakeholder Sentiment
  • Fishermen’s Perspective: Industry leaders, like those in the Hawaii Longline Association, view the orders as a “game-changer” for reducing costs and increasing access. Hilo fishermen likely share this optimism, particularly for longline operations.
Reply
Grok as you know is run by Musk, so predictably it’s a summary of administration talking points.
But you got me thinking so I asked Chat GPT.  It also mentioned expanded fishing grounds but added:

Considerations and Concerns:
1. Environmental Impact: Environmental groups and some scientists express concern that reopening these areas could threaten marine biodiversity, including endangered species like sea turtles.  
2. Sustainability: There are worries that increased fishing activity could lead to overfishing and long-term depletion of fish stocks, which would negatively affect the fishing industry in the future.
3. Regulatory Compliance: Fishermen will need to navigate and comply with existing regulations set by agencies like NOAA and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which manage the PRIMNM.

In summary, while the reopening of the PRIMNM presents new opportunities for Hilo fishermen, it also brings challenges that require careful consideration of environmental sustainability and regulatory compliance.


But I wonder how it will affect the average guy? Ellie’s roadside $20 Ahi for instance? Will they benefit? And how much?
Reply
Good points.  Only time will tell but I think Ellie, Suisan, Mama's Hilo Sushi, and Hilo fishermen will be saying, "so long-line and thanks for all of the fish".
Reply
I found this Nat Geo article from 2014 about expanding the Pacific Remote Islands Marine National Monument to be informative, contrasting the small amount of tuna actually caught in this area by boats from American Samoa for their 5000 person Starkist cannery against the need to "protect deep corals that are thousands of years old, 22 species of marine mammals, five species of endangered sea turtles, and millions of fish and nesting seabirds. The area [also] hosts one of the largest populations of manta rays and sharks"
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adven...nservation

Given that 90 percent of all large predatory fish like tuna have been removed from the ocean, lifting habitat protections now to go after the last 10 percent is about as far out of balance as is possible. All of this to give even more market dominance to a South Korean company (Starkist is wholly owned by Dongwon Industries and has 46% of the U.S market share for room temperature tuna products) while pretending to bolster the American seafood industry doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Sorry, Charlie!
Reply
Seems like the Congresswoman from Samoa, Aumua Amata is pretty excited about the prospects of Trump's fishy actions for her constituents here in 2025 and beyond.

https://radewagen.house.gov/media-center...-fishing-0
Reply
American Samoa doesn't have a Senator, it has a Representative (looks like you fixed this now). And of course she is interested in strip mining the area, as it brings home the sashimi for her constituents. Some people though have to look beyond the horizons of their own narrow short-term interests and think of the bigger picture that's not measured just in dollars.
Reply
How much easier/faster/better/cheaper would it be for local fishermen to leave from Pohoiki?
Certainty will be the death of us.
Reply
Biden basically killed the cannery in American Samoa when he created the marine monument.

They cannery is the only industry for an island of 50,000.


https://www.pacificislandtimes.com/post/...a-industry
Reply
Maybe RTFA? Biden didn't create the monument - this was about a proposed expansion and the cannery is still there in Pago Pago. Jesus Christo, grant patience and enough fish to feed a multitude of the illiterate.
Reply
They cannery is the only industry for an island of 50,000.

When I was there almost all of the workers were from Tonga. 50,000 American Samoans didn’t want to work there.

Side note: A giant Charley the Tuna stood outside the factory. His eyes were painted on his glasses, which broke off on one side and hung at a 40 degree angle. Seeing that was my favorite part on the way into Pago Pago, as the road curved around the factory and the harbor.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)