06-21-2018, 04:17 AM
http://www.hawaiitribune-herald.com/2018...testimony/
The usual Council Churn ... but:
Puna Councilwoman Eileen O'Hara tried to sweeten the deal by adding language that would allow the planning director to accept applications for new short-term vacation rentals to replace those lost during an emergency. She estimated as many as 400 vacation rentals, almost half of the inventory in her district, were destroyed by lava flows.
...
Other officials were unsure about allowing vacation rentals to be rebuilt when the point of the bill is to move them out of inappropriate zones.
...
The measure is an attempt to prohibit unhosted short-term rentals in residential and agricultural zones, while allowing them in hotel and resort zones as well as commercial districts.
As usual, I'm left with a dumb question: where, exactly, are the "appropriate zones" in Puna? Meeting the stated intent would require County to upzone substantial acreage in order to meet their own requirements.
Meanwhile, we have this "$5M shortfall" in the budget -- just on real estate taxes, nobody has yet calculated the tourism decline due to the loss of "400 short-term vacation rentals".
Can we get some real governance, please?
The usual Council Churn ... but:
Puna Councilwoman Eileen O'Hara tried to sweeten the deal by adding language that would allow the planning director to accept applications for new short-term vacation rentals to replace those lost during an emergency. She estimated as many as 400 vacation rentals, almost half of the inventory in her district, were destroyed by lava flows.
...
Other officials were unsure about allowing vacation rentals to be rebuilt when the point of the bill is to move them out of inappropriate zones.
...
The measure is an attempt to prohibit unhosted short-term rentals in residential and agricultural zones, while allowing them in hotel and resort zones as well as commercial districts.
As usual, I'm left with a dumb question: where, exactly, are the "appropriate zones" in Puna? Meeting the stated intent would require County to upzone substantial acreage in order to meet their own requirements.
Meanwhile, we have this "$5M shortfall" in the budget -- just on real estate taxes, nobody has yet calculated the tourism decline due to the loss of "400 short-term vacation rentals".
Can we get some real governance, please?