Does this really belong on the front page?

[PaulW]

"Do you have any idea how disingenuous it is to judge one group of people, living in a different era, with different norms, by your standards of your day?"

Later in the same post you go on to do exactly that yourself.
Troll or just plain stupid? I still can't decide.

[Sugarloaf]

Nice try - epic fail. M. Sanger was a single person, not a group of people. Keep trying. One day your bat will contact horsehide.

[VancouverIslander]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sugarloaf

---

Well,, unless you attack a women, leave her alive, but cause the death or her in-utero child, and get prosecuted for murder. Except, well, for that....... BTW, these abortions are taking places days, even hours before natural live childbirth would occur, largely as a way to raise money for the Planned Infanticide organization performing them.
[/quote]

This kind of argument reminds me of debating young earth creationists. Ignore 98% of the oppositions argument and bring in mostly irrelevant and massively spun 'exceptions'. To argue that abortions are largely a way to raise money for Planned Parenthood is a stretch that even the most gullible would question. And anyone who attacks a pregnant woman.... well, lets leave it at that. Even a neo-con can figure the right and wrong of it.

I'm starting to be reminded of previously banned trolls. Anyone else getting that feeling?

Just call me Mike

[Sugarloaf]

quote:

---

Originally posted by VancouverIslander

quote:

---

Originally posted by Sugarloaf

---

Well,, unless you attack a women, leave her alive, but cause the death or her in-utero child, and get prosecuted for murder. Except, well, for that....... BTW, these abortions are taking places days, even hours before natural live childbirth would occur, largely as a way to raise money for the Planned Infanticide organization performing them.

---

This kind of argument reminds me of debating young earth creationists. Ignore 98% of the oppositions argument and bring in mostly irrelevant and massively spun 'exceptions'. To argue that abortions are largely a way to raise money for Planned Parenthood is a stretch that even the most gullible would question. And anyone who attacks a pregnant woman.... well, lets leave it at that. Even a neo-con can figure the right and wrong of it.

I'm starting to be reminded of previously banned trolls. Anyone else getting that feeling?

Just call me Mike
[/quote]

I am referring to the late-term abortions. It is sad that you are so seemingly out of the loop that you are not even aware of the recent discoveries about Planned Infanticide and their sales efforts, as well as training their staff to snuff out the child without crushing any of the saleable "parts". Tapes were made of sales pitches being made. Isis can't hold a candle to some of this stuff.

And now, because you and your side (including the guy who wants to have the poor 1st Amendment advocate terminated) are losing the debate, you are attempting to play the ultimate Censorship card (at least on this forum). Man-up old bean.

I repeat, just so you have every opportunity to "get it", I fully support his rights to tell the America people exactly what is happening in abortion mills such as Planned Infanticide, the efforts of "Infanticide-Deniers" notwithstanding. Planned Parenthood, no matter what tiny bit of good it might have done in its past, is America's Auschwitz.