Council Powers & Functions: Back to Basics

[DaVinci]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Irongstone

All the power not specifically granted to the federal gov't by the constitution, is left to the states and the people of those states. For a local community to elect a sheriff as its representative police force and expect protection from illegal acts like warrantless search and siezure, we should ourselves be willing deputies that can be called upon to support the sheriff in an unusual situation.

---

No offense intended, really, but you sound like you live in Tombstone AZ in the 1870s (and spend a lot of time reading Tom Paine...)

[DaVinci]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Irongstone


Therefore, if federal or other non-local forces illegally harrass my neighbor, then local authorities, and I if asked, must arrest them. I guess this is where the rubber meets the road for liberty and freedom.

---

The difficulty here is just exactly what you mean by "illegally harass." You are correct in a previous post when you allude to the protection afforded the citizenry from the soldiery by the posse comitatus of 1878, but if, say, an FBI agent were to knock on your neighbor's door, he'd most likely have the proper paperwork in hand before he set about depriving anybody of their liberty. And that being the case, it would be most prudent for local police (and you) to let the agent do his job and then let the judicial system sort out the legality of that job (or lack thereof)... otherwise we end up with flaring tempers and CNN camping out on the perimeter and children getting burned to death. That's not liberty...

[DaVinci]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Bob Orts

.

May I suggest that instead of faulting him based on a completely honest answer, and a truthful answer that every candidate will enforce the law because they can't ignore the current law or they can be removed from office, how about providing suggest for him to review?

---

Thanks Bob. Couldn't have said it better myself. I will add one thought: this being a society based on Law, we are best served by those who would apply that law equally to all citizens. If James had the power to forgive a poor family who could not pay their property tax, he would also have the power to demand much more, arbitrarily, from another family, based upon nothing, a whim, his mood, the positions of the stars. He will not have said power. Emily does not now have said power. Thank your lucky stars that this is so...

[Irongstone]

Here's a link to an article with videos, about a sheriff that stood up to federal agents who didn't have sufficient, i.e. constitutionally valid, paperwork. One time he threatened to bring in his own SWAT team against the agents' SWAT team: http://www.infowars.com/constitutional%C...ony-demeo/

[Irongstone]

Of course we wouldn't expect our county police to protect our constitutional rights as well as that Nevada sheriff, Tony DeMeo, protects his constituents. But would it be possible to at least get the police to not cooperate with unconstitutional actions like warrantless search and seizure or forced vaccinations? The police would have to want to help us and then they would also have to be educated about the bill of rights. It may be too late for all that if county government and police are already dependent on and controlled by state and federal money.

[whalesong]

quote:

---

Originally posted by james weatherford

Whalesong,

Yes, at least I was honest in recognizing what the default situation is.
Please ask the same question of whom ever you do choose to vote for; and, when/if they answer, determine if they are telling you the truth or just lieing to get your vote.
I also offered to listen to alternatives.
Do you have any?
Thanks.



James Weatherford, Ph.D.
15-1888 Hialoa
Hawaiian Paradise Park

---

James,
The only thing we can do now is live within our means and pay off our debts, and stay out of debt.

They no longer want us to be PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS. IMHO

Have you ever Ask yourself, Who is really running America?

I hope this will enlighten you and others. It explains, how we arrived at the current default system,why, and how we are all now subject to follow it, like it or not.
But the question still remains, how do we change it?

This is for those, that want to understand, how we arrived at our current default laws read on.
http://www.barefootsworld.net/usfraud.html

[wax]

James, I had heard that you chaired the PCDP committee on Agriculture and were a leader in concluding that the County should purchase agricultural land in Puna for the purpose of then leasing it out to farmers. How do you see this (purchasing land and leasing it out) fitting in with you "Back to Basics" message?

[Kapohocat]

quote:

---

Originally posted by whalesong...

They no longer want us to be PRIVATE PROPERTY OWNERS. IMHO

Have you ever Ask yourself, Who is really running America?

I hope this will enlighten you and others. It explains, how we arrived at the current default system,why, and how we are all now subject to follow it, like it or not.
But the question still remains, how do we change it?

This is for those, that want to understand, how we arrived at our current default laws read on.
http://www.barefootsworld.net/usfraud.html

---

You know, honestly in my book, James will do a good job and do as much as he can for us. He cant bring down the world banking order as it exists (and James if you can you'll get my vote for president, too, if you choose to run! []).

[james weatherford]

quote:

---

Originally posted by wax

James, I had heard that you chaired the PCDP committee on Agriculture and were a leader in concluding that the County should purchase agricultural land in Puna for the purpose of then leasing it out to farmers. How do you see this (purchasing land and leasing it out) fitting in with you "Back to Basics" message?

---

Yes, I was the convener for the PCDP Agriculture working group.
I, individually, never concluded the County should purchase agricultural land.
One of several ideas that emerged from that group was the County "purchasing" land.
I, personally, did not support that idea.
The working group report, a product of consensus, states as an objective, "Public and/or private investment in ‘agricultural parks’ or equivalent." This might or might not be the County "purchasing" land.
The final PCDP states as an action item,
"Create a fund to purchase or receive identified important agricultural lands".
How this "fund" would actually work is undefined. It could involve some public money and/or land as leverage for private funds and/or land.
There is nothing in what I spoke for in the working group that contradicts my 'back to basics' message.
Note, I was only one person on the working group and not an autocrat. Some ideas brought forward by the group I accepted as being of interest to a majority of the group, even if I personally had reservations.
The working group report was not adopted whole-body into the final PCDP. Again, the result of a community effort.
Note, many good ideas in the various working groups still exist and are available. Once in office, it is my intention to review these working group reports carefully and see what can be implemented, no matter what is or is not in final PCDP.





James Weatherford, Ph.D.
15-1888 Hialoa
Hawaiian Paradise Park

[DaVinci]

A purchase and lease program doesn't automatically mean sharecropping poor Hawaiians... The merit of any proposal lies in the details. It could turn out badly, especially if not well defined prior to implementation. However, it could in fact be fair and beneficial... after all, DHHL is a lease program.