09-08-2012, 05:09 PM
Scientists and researchers have warned about the dangers of genetically modified food for awhile now... and Monsanto repeatedly works to block the ability to do human testing, hmmm. Wonder why? it's certainly no secret.
http://www.responsibletechnology.org/gmo-dangers
https://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/07/05-0
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles..._11361.cfm
http://www.naturalnews.com/033784_GMO_animal_feed.html
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articl...ption.aspx
Furthermore,
Ron Paul is not against labeling GMO products for health reasons, as he stated in comments to vote-texas.org in 2008. In fact he is for regulation- as long as we the people are the ones who regulate it via manufacturers and retailers:
"The federal government lacks constitutional authority to mandate labeling of products containing genetically-modified food. Furthermore, those who do not wish to consume genetically-modified products should be leery of federally-mandated labeling because history shows that federal regulatory agencies are susceptible to ‘capture,’ where the regulators end up serving the interest of the business they are supposed to control. In the case of labeling, federal agencies could redefine the meaning of ‘modified’ to allow genetically-engineered food on the market without fully-informing consumers of the presence of genetically- engineered ingredients. Instead of federal regulation, consumers should demand that manufactures provide full information and refuse to buy those products that are not fully labeled. Once producers see there is a demand for non-genetically-engineered products they will act to fulfill that demand. Of course, makers of genetically-engineered food should be held legally responsible if they fraudulently market their products or harm anyone."
http://www.responsibletechnology.org/gmo-dangers
https://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/07/05-0
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles..._11361.cfm
http://www.naturalnews.com/033784_GMO_animal_feed.html
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articl...ption.aspx
Furthermore,
Ron Paul is not against labeling GMO products for health reasons, as he stated in comments to vote-texas.org in 2008. In fact he is for regulation- as long as we the people are the ones who regulate it via manufacturers and retailers:
"The federal government lacks constitutional authority to mandate labeling of products containing genetically-modified food. Furthermore, those who do not wish to consume genetically-modified products should be leery of federally-mandated labeling because history shows that federal regulatory agencies are susceptible to ‘capture,’ where the regulators end up serving the interest of the business they are supposed to control. In the case of labeling, federal agencies could redefine the meaning of ‘modified’ to allow genetically-engineered food on the market without fully-informing consumers of the presence of genetically- engineered ingredients. Instead of federal regulation, consumers should demand that manufactures provide full information and refuse to buy those products that are not fully labeled. Once producers see there is a demand for non-genetically-engineered products they will act to fulfill that demand. Of course, makers of genetically-engineered food should be held legally responsible if they fraudulently market their products or harm anyone."