10-09-2014, 05:56 PM
Mendo, AM, (and James),
"The ferry died due to Lingle administration not following the law, not any inherent problem with the ferry itself. It needed an EIS but they couldn't be bothered. It could work if we do it right. Stop trying to blame environmentalists for this stupid error."
"The real nail in the coffin for the Superferry was no EIS."
I agree with all of the above, but even if an EIS was done I suspect the ferry was doomed. Just look at what is happening with the TMT which has done an EIS. For the TMT the delays are significant but since the funding is not commercial there is a buffer zone. With a commercial entity such as the Superferry, even if they had done an EIS the subsequent lawsuits would have likely killed off the project anyway as they would have delayed things so much the company would have gone bankrupt no matter what.
No expert in the matter, just my opinion.
"The ferry died due to Lingle administration not following the law, not any inherent problem with the ferry itself. It needed an EIS but they couldn't be bothered. It could work if we do it right. Stop trying to blame environmentalists for this stupid error."
"The real nail in the coffin for the Superferry was no EIS."
I agree with all of the above, but even if an EIS was done I suspect the ferry was doomed. Just look at what is happening with the TMT which has done an EIS. For the TMT the delays are significant but since the funding is not commercial there is a buffer zone. With a commercial entity such as the Superferry, even if they had done an EIS the subsequent lawsuits would have likely killed off the project anyway as they would have delayed things so much the company would have gone bankrupt no matter what.
No expert in the matter, just my opinion.