08-31-2016, 06:03 AM
As I understand it, the beleaguered UH football program faces several unique obstacles due to our island geography. The team must travel to play away, and there are fatigue/jet lag issues associated with this necessity. Then there's the expense of this travel, and I heard recently that the travel expenses of teams that UH plays here at Aloha stadium are covered by the UH (if anyone can confirm or correct what I heard on this I'd welcome input). Recruiting is tough for the UH program, because highly rated players are aware that the team has an uneven record and outstanding local high school and mainland players are generally inclined to play for mainland schools which have more consistent records of success.
My main concern/question regards the strange (to me at least) trend for the Warriors to play their initial games against highly rated programs (Division 1 teams?). For instance, Cal and Michigan this year. The same thing occurred under coach Chow and has happened for several seasons if I recall correctly. From my point of view, The Warriors are being offered up to powerhouse programs, almost as fodder to boost the confidence these highly ranked opponents will carry into the regular season. On the other hand, UH players experience almost assured defeat as a first taste of the season they in turn are about to face. I wonder how many injuries result from these initial games against the sort of athletes that the Warriors are facing in the pre-season. Seems to me that it might be better for them to start the season against less imposing opponents so that their health, self-esteem, and optimism about the coming season have a chance to survive their initial playing experiences.
Am I the only one confused about this pre-season practice? Could it be due to lack of local control over scheduling, or is it just bad judgement on the part of the UH athletic department? Maybe they somehow imagine an almost insurmountable challenge will somehow be good for the team? Is anyone entertaining hopes that the Warriors wont be crushed by Michigan? In my view, loading up the initial season with such opponents seems like a poor way to improve the record of a program that already faces the obstacles our island locale presents. Clearly the coaches at schools like Cal and Michigan aren't choosing to start their seasons with a probable defeat.
My main concern/question regards the strange (to me at least) trend for the Warriors to play their initial games against highly rated programs (Division 1 teams?). For instance, Cal and Michigan this year. The same thing occurred under coach Chow and has happened for several seasons if I recall correctly. From my point of view, The Warriors are being offered up to powerhouse programs, almost as fodder to boost the confidence these highly ranked opponents will carry into the regular season. On the other hand, UH players experience almost assured defeat as a first taste of the season they in turn are about to face. I wonder how many injuries result from these initial games against the sort of athletes that the Warriors are facing in the pre-season. Seems to me that it might be better for them to start the season against less imposing opponents so that their health, self-esteem, and optimism about the coming season have a chance to survive their initial playing experiences.
Am I the only one confused about this pre-season practice? Could it be due to lack of local control over scheduling, or is it just bad judgement on the part of the UH athletic department? Maybe they somehow imagine an almost insurmountable challenge will somehow be good for the team? Is anyone entertaining hopes that the Warriors wont be crushed by Michigan? In my view, loading up the initial season with such opponents seems like a poor way to improve the record of a program that already faces the obstacles our island locale presents. Clearly the coaches at schools like Cal and Michigan aren't choosing to start their seasons with a probable defeat.