06-10-2018, 07:12 AM
Hot air balloons - excellent idea, HOTPE
AaronM:
Wow Mark. People are still living in shelters, tents and vehicles and you think the County should spend time and money figuring out how to pander to the tourism industry?
Thanks for nothing pal.
Lemmie see if I got this straight (and AaronM wasn't the only one to comment this way):
Lava viewing in HVNP is fine. We all welcome that.
But not in Puna because of the widespread devastation to Puna homes. Built in Zone 1 lava flow terrain.
Which posters on other threads repeatedly derided as foolish decision-making (so much so that I opined that such sentiment was inappropriate at this time.)
I'll reverse my view: If the state and county had acted wisely and never allowed these subdivisions, we might not be having this discussion.
The lava would be spewing in an uninhabited area and officials could move promptly to set up viewing. (Well, maybe not Hawaii County officials moving promptly, but capable officials in most any municipality would have done this.)
Why? Because aside from the destruction of homes, this lava event has 1) shut down HVNP and 2) indirectly affected a large part of East Hawaii.
Result: Major economic losses to thousands of people in East Hawaii. Business owners. Their employees. People with rent due and mortgages and food bills to pay.
What about them? Don't they count for anything?
By the way, when HVNP reopens, do you think the visitor count will magically bounce back to 5,000 a day? With no more lava viewing from Jagger outlook because the level in the Halamaumau crater has dropped? With the valued coastal recreation area at the Kapoho tidepools gone?
Many East Hawaii visitors came for both HVNP and Puna shoreline recreation.
East Hawaii's economic woes are growing by the day. We need any help or advantage we can get. Fissure 8 lava viewing should be considered even when HVNP opens.
AaronM:
Wow Mark. People are still living in shelters, tents and vehicles and you think the County should spend time and money figuring out how to pander to the tourism industry?
Thanks for nothing pal.
Lemmie see if I got this straight (and AaronM wasn't the only one to comment this way):
Lava viewing in HVNP is fine. We all welcome that.
But not in Puna because of the widespread devastation to Puna homes. Built in Zone 1 lava flow terrain.
Which posters on other threads repeatedly derided as foolish decision-making (so much so that I opined that such sentiment was inappropriate at this time.)
I'll reverse my view: If the state and county had acted wisely and never allowed these subdivisions, we might not be having this discussion.
The lava would be spewing in an uninhabited area and officials could move promptly to set up viewing. (Well, maybe not Hawaii County officials moving promptly, but capable officials in most any municipality would have done this.)
Why? Because aside from the destruction of homes, this lava event has 1) shut down HVNP and 2) indirectly affected a large part of East Hawaii.
Result: Major economic losses to thousands of people in East Hawaii. Business owners. Their employees. People with rent due and mortgages and food bills to pay.
What about them? Don't they count for anything?
By the way, when HVNP reopens, do you think the visitor count will magically bounce back to 5,000 a day? With no more lava viewing from Jagger outlook because the level in the Halamaumau crater has dropped? With the valued coastal recreation area at the Kapoho tidepools gone?
Many East Hawaii visitors came for both HVNP and Puna shoreline recreation.
East Hawaii's economic woes are growing by the day. We need any help or advantage we can get. Fissure 8 lava viewing should be considered even when HVNP opens.