(01-15-2025, 08:26 PM)leilanidude Wrote: -------
Doing this now may result in those 20 acre lots finally used for the rest of the uses that they were originally designed to be.
Parking lots, just like driveways, are not roads. The County does not use their road budget to pave Walmart, Safeway, or any Hilo business parking lot (unless it's a County business).
Development of the 20 acre lots is HPPOA's issue. HPPOA owns the lots. HPP Owners do not. This holds true for the HPPOA clubhouse house as well- which is why Owners have to pay to use it.
If HPPOA wants to develop their lots, then they need to find a means, other than road fee money, to fund that development.
Moving mailboxes, because it "may" result in the 20 acre lots being used for what they were meant, is not even close to realistic. And in violating deed restrictions, on all four lots, it is quite possible that HPPOA could lose those lots.
(01-15-2025, 07:11 PM)Obie Wrote: Patricia
Why do you insist on cramming your version of the history of Puna subdivisions down the throats of people who have lived here through that history 1st hand.
Mr. O. you only superfilously answered the questions and even then, were rude about it. "Board haters?"
I do appreciate you sharing your thoughts on the current amount of road fees collected, which you feel are "inadequate?" I do not agree (surprise). If there is enough road fee money for HPPOA to remove $170,000/year and stick it in their Non-Roads Property line, then it seems to me there MUST be enough in road fees being collected.
Question: If HPPOA can take $170,000 in "compensation" put it in their Non-Roads Property line, but there is no corresponding debit for that amount in HPPOA's non-road expense line, then is that $170,000 not considered profit?
As for Puna history, I do not know as much about the entire area (which is quite large). Nor do I know as much about HPP (Waikehakeha and Keaau's history) as I do about HPPOA. But I do know quite a bit about HPPOA (what it's former name was, how it was formed, why it was formed, who the first "members" were, who their first lawyers were, what their goals were, the reasons for their lawsuits, their intent (from the very beginning) to fashion themselves into a "viable community association" and "compel" owners to be members (read that document), their non-compliance with court orders, and on, and on.
As I have said before, I know how to research and I have experience researching history (as well as working for a non-profit). I was not around when the Greasy Grass Battle occurred, but the Smithsonian seemed content enough with my research.
Edited for ease of reading