Cannabis Decriminalition

[mdd7000]

quote:

---

Originally posted by JWFITZ

Would the legalization advocates be willing to concede to a mandatory blood test and a state legal limit of intoxication of THC with a arbitrary limit(whatever that number is, I don't know--the pot equivalent of the .08) in the same manner that one might be subjected to a breath test with alcohol on event of a vehicle related accident? Just curious. It might offer a middle way to the cause.
http://sensiblesimplicity.lefora.com/

---

No they wouldn't - because, as you recall, it is "harmless". They don't want the rest of the public to know the results of that question.
Ever been down to "name your local park here" and watched people smoke weed and then leave - driving? Many of them also drink alcohol along with it. IF they get pulled over, they get a breathalyser for alcohol. They pass, they get to go. The officer has no idea if they have had "too much weed". They simply passed under the .08 for alcohol. It is much easier for the police to do a breathalyser on the scene as opposed to a hospital blood test for other drug use.