S.P.A.C.E. Community Meeting - March 6th

[Bob Orts]

quote:

---

Originally posted by KathyH

[quote]Hasn't S.P.A.C.E. used the SUP to gradually bring in activities that would normally require commercial zoning

---

That’s an important part (ignored by many) on the issue. Another item being ignored is the SUP violations are not just what is going on now, but also that there was site violations the applicant was supposed to correct when the permit was issued. They not only knowingly overstepped the bounds of what they promised they wouldn’t do but also failed to do what they promised from the beginning.

If I were the County, I wouldn’t give them any special new considerations because they didn’t even do what they were supposed to do from the start. How can they be trusted? If their permit is amended to give them permission for increased activities, will they go beyond that again? They broke their promise and trust in them is dead.

Now don’t you think that will be in the County’s minds whenever any community group applies for an SUP? So is this helping or hurting?