07-30-2010, 09:12 AM
Bob; the disabled vet exemption is a 'homeowners' exemption; one must live in the property in order for it to apply. Regarding your suggestion of reductions for owners of multiple properties, your argument is good as long as all the other properties remain empty. If there are residents (family or tenants) then use is being made of the county facilities.
A larger tax for 'big families' would tend to penalise poorer people.
BTW, what exemptions are being applied to the $100 minimum to get an even lower figure?
Also, what about a reduction of tax for those homes on catchment and septic/cesspool systems? No use is being made of county water or sewage!
Realistically, we need to be prepared to speak out about tax increases and make our elected 'representatives' understand that ALL the fat must be cut from county budgets before taking more money from those who are trying to stay afloat in these tough times. Let's get Billy to explain his phantom savings for a start!
A larger tax for 'big families' would tend to penalise poorer people.
BTW, what exemptions are being applied to the $100 minimum to get an even lower figure?
Also, what about a reduction of tax for those homes on catchment and septic/cesspool systems? No use is being made of county water or sewage!
Realistically, we need to be prepared to speak out about tax increases and make our elected 'representatives' understand that ALL the fat must be cut from county budgets before taking more money from those who are trying to stay afloat in these tough times. Let's get Billy to explain his phantom savings for a start!