11-10-2010, 11:18 AM
well, from the outside looking in I would say three things:
1. There appears to be enough of the public wanting the road to remain public to justify it remaining public.
2. The news on Chris Yuen's research on the road history may well wipe out any theory that the CoH has no need or interest in maintaining ownership.
3. I see no downside to the property owners if the gate is removed and the road is public. The talk about cattle getting out is a red herring. Cattle owners need to maintain their own fencing and gates.
1. There appears to be enough of the public wanting the road to remain public to justify it remaining public.
2. The news on Chris Yuen's research on the road history may well wipe out any theory that the CoH has no need or interest in maintaining ownership.
3. I see no downside to the property owners if the gate is removed and the road is public. The talk about cattle getting out is a red herring. Cattle owners need to maintain their own fencing and gates.
Assume the best and ask questions.
Punaweb moderator
Punaweb moderator