01-05-2011, 06:16 AM
I think there is an art in functionality and durability.
I have seen many of the art houses from the 60s and 70s abandoned because no one could actually live there (grew up across the river from Woodstock). And I’ve seen many buildings -houses, bars, shops still being used and looking the same after 100 plus ( some 200) years. Which is more impressive?
I have seen many of the art houses from the 60s and 70s abandoned because no one could actually live there (grew up across the river from Woodstock). And I’ve seen many buildings -houses, bars, shops still being used and looking the same after 100 plus ( some 200) years. Which is more impressive?