|
Puna cliffs
|
02-23-2011, 01:48 PM
Just about spot on, Royall, 0.4 secs in both cases. It appears to be a good exposure time for capturing the movement of the water without smoothing it out too much.
Tom http://apacificview.blogspot.com/ |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Puna cliffs - by TomK - 02-08-2011, 05:13 PM
RE: Puna cliffs - by Rob Tucker - 02-08-2011, 05:18 PM
RE: Puna cliffs - by tndhansen - 02-08-2011, 05:26 PM
RE: Puna cliffs - by David M - 02-08-2011, 07:12 PM
RE: Puna cliffs - by Royall - 02-09-2011, 03:08 AM
RE: Puna cliffs - by punafish - 02-09-2011, 03:47 AM
RE: Puna cliffs - by Ed Smay - 02-09-2011, 12:21 PM
RE: Puna cliffs - by Peter Epperson - 02-09-2011, 12:37 PM
RE: Puna cliffs - by LeeE - 02-09-2011, 12:57 PM
RE: Puna cliffs - by Funkstopper - 02-09-2011, 06:25 PM
RE: Puna cliffs - by TomK - 02-09-2011, 07:45 PM
RE: Puna cliffs - by TomK - 02-22-2011, 06:21 PM
RE: Puna cliffs - by Royall - 02-23-2011, 03:09 AM
RE: Puna cliffs - by TomK - 02-23-2011, 01:48 PM
RE: Puna cliffs - by tmyc - 02-23-2011, 03:39 PM
RE: Puna cliffs - by aline - 02-24-2011, 01:02 PM
RE: Puna cliffs - by TomK - 02-24-2011, 04:08 PM
|
