05-03-2011, 06:18 AM
quote:
Originally posted by DanielP
(from PCDP) "While the concept of a limited access parkway has merit, it would be very difficult to acquire right-of-way for this through a large subdivision such as HPP in a timely and cost effective manner. Therefore, a shorter route through HPP is a more practical and less disruptive
alternative to implement within the time-frame of this plan."
This statement, is nonsensical.
"shorter route through HPP"?
what is that?
how is that different from "large subdivision such as HPP" that can't be done?
If the issue is the "limited access parkway", [as Rob Tucker and I each proposed in separate ways and both of these ideas are at the PCDP website], then the limited access is outside of HPP, that is, between Pahoa and HPP and between HPP and Hilo.
As I said on the previous post, look at the difference between the Working Group Report and the Final PCDP.