Punaweb Forum › Punaweb Forums › Punatalk v
Nanawale, why not ?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
Nanawale, why not ?
punaticbychoice Offline
Posting Freak
*****
Posts: 1,175
Threads: 12
Joined: Jun 2008
#15
05-29-2011, 06:23 AM
Yes Jerry, some properties are grandfathered in if they are permitted and under 880 sf.
Substandard non- permitted structures are currently being subjected to legal action as far as I know.
Long process so we'll see.
Website Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Nanawale, why not ? - by Guest - 05-27-2011, 03:58 PM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by macuu222 - 05-27-2011, 04:37 PM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by riverwolf - 05-28-2011, 12:52 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by John S. Rabi - 05-28-2011, 06:47 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by rusty h - 05-28-2011, 08:10 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by Rob Tucker - 05-28-2011, 08:21 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by JerryCarr - 05-28-2011, 08:47 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by Kapohocat - 05-28-2011, 09:07 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by John S. Rabi - 05-28-2011, 11:53 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by melo1112 - 05-28-2011, 12:13 PM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by dmbwest - 05-28-2011, 03:00 PM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by Kapohocat - 05-29-2011, 04:56 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by John S. Rabi - 05-29-2011, 05:12 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by JerryCarr - 05-29-2011, 05:26 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by punaticbychoice - 05-29-2011, 06:23 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by John S. Rabi - 05-29-2011, 07:22 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by punaticbychoice - 05-29-2011, 09:10 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by Rene - 05-29-2011, 11:05 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by KeaauRich - 05-29-2011, 11:52 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by John S. Rabi - 05-29-2011, 02:09 PM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by Donivan - 05-31-2011, 03:32 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)