Punaweb Forum › Punaweb Forums › Punatalk v
Nanawale, why not ?

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
Nanawale, why not ?
Rene Offline
Member
***
Posts: 148
Threads: 9
Joined: Apr 2009
#18
05-29-2011, 11:05 AM
It's possible that they may have no CCR recorded on it. If the lot was purchsed before they were enacted, they can't go back and retro actively record them on the deed. Same thing with "road fees", if your deed doesn't have them recorded, your not subject to them.
Website Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Nanawale, why not ? - by Guest - 05-27-2011, 03:58 PM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by macuu222 - 05-27-2011, 04:37 PM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by riverwolf - 05-28-2011, 12:52 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by John S. Rabi - 05-28-2011, 06:47 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by rusty h - 05-28-2011, 08:10 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by Rob Tucker - 05-28-2011, 08:21 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by JerryCarr - 05-28-2011, 08:47 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by Kapohocat - 05-28-2011, 09:07 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by John S. Rabi - 05-28-2011, 11:53 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by melo1112 - 05-28-2011, 12:13 PM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by dmbwest - 05-28-2011, 03:00 PM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by Kapohocat - 05-29-2011, 04:56 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by John S. Rabi - 05-29-2011, 05:12 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by JerryCarr - 05-29-2011, 05:26 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by punaticbychoice - 05-29-2011, 06:23 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by John S. Rabi - 05-29-2011, 07:22 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by punaticbychoice - 05-29-2011, 09:10 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by Rene - 05-29-2011, 11:05 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by KeaauRich - 05-29-2011, 11:52 AM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by John S. Rabi - 05-29-2011, 02:09 PM
RE: Nanawale, why not ? - by Donivan - 05-31-2011, 03:32 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)