05-08-2012, 09:07 AM
"The process was set us so that more knowledgeable people are involved."
That is a slippery slope indeed. Who determines who is more knowledgeable? I'm a fan of proportional representation myself. One person, one vote. Majority wins.
Some reports I read said that the Paul delegates were hiding their affiliation; if asked if they were actual Romney supporters they were to say: "I just want Obama out".
This is very clever but nonetheless very underhanded. But what can you expect from someone who published racist newsletters when it was profitable to do so, and then denied doing so when it was, again, profitable to do so?
Now, isn't this a lot more interesting than posting the same links again and again that nobody will read?
Thanks for educating me Andrew, this is all quite fascinating. What are the chances that they will expel Paul from the Party for this?
That is a slippery slope indeed. Who determines who is more knowledgeable? I'm a fan of proportional representation myself. One person, one vote. Majority wins.
Some reports I read said that the Paul delegates were hiding their affiliation; if asked if they were actual Romney supporters they were to say: "I just want Obama out".
This is very clever but nonetheless very underhanded. But what can you expect from someone who published racist newsletters when it was profitable to do so, and then denied doing so when it was, again, profitable to do so?
Now, isn't this a lot more interesting than posting the same links again and again that nobody will read?
Thanks for educating me Andrew, this is all quite fascinating. What are the chances that they will expel Paul from the Party for this?