06-07-2014, 06:13 AM
Although I understand there is a serious and realistic need for a HARC revision, what I don't understand is why this is happening at this particular time. Who in the world would want a seat on HACA with an impending law suit and looming receivership.
With both HACA and HARC involved in legal issues any new board members will be sucked down the same hole. Certainly dos not make much sense to me right now.
None the less......think I will stay the course with HACA as at least I know what to expect. Receivership should resolve all standing issues that exist with these boards.
Any thoughts ?
With both HACA and HARC involved in legal issues any new board members will be sucked down the same hole. Certainly dos not make much sense to me right now.
None the less......think I will stay the course with HACA as at least I know what to expect. Receivership should resolve all standing issues that exist with these boards.
Any thoughts ?