05-17-2012, 03:23 AM
quote:
Originally posted by Tiffany Edwards...
How unfortunate that my position on a rezoning is warping into a discussion demonizing me.
So, kapohocat, since you are fixated on the skate shop, let me clarify that the skate-shop folks you refer to were at one point buying the property at issue from the Galans, as the Galans were undergoing the rezoning process. The skate-shop people are not the Galans. The Galans live in Kapa'au and have lived there since 2004. The Galans are now pitching the Pahoa Boutiques and Bungalows project....
My questions are valid questions on the subject property - not your property. You and another mentioned a property sale and 48 uses. I am not demonizing you. I am asking questions to get some insight but if you want to take it that way as demonizing - go ahead - although, frankly, I see a few others actually picking at you, yet you did not lash out at them.
I am using the Term "skate people" because I had no idea what else had been planned there except for what my clients had thought about planning 2+ yrs ago and then changed their minds about getting involved in it. If someone else becomes interested in it again that I work with, I do like knowing a history - that is why I am interested. Actually when my clients looked at it, we talked about what nice neighbors the surf shop would be. They considered your business a bonus but then they started into the rezoning issues and decided otherwise on the property.
So you did answer one question I asked: is the property for sale again? From your answer, a yes, would be inferred. Implied? I always forgot which one applies where.
Edited to reduce assertive questions.