01-03-2013, 04:59 AM
The county code has regulations on dogs, that are not superseded by the private status of the subdivision, & the regulations are not about the road status, but are about the nature of the dog (ie, special code for 'vicious' animal) & confinement of the dog within a property...
So no, if the activity is against the county code, the land/dog owner has the liability, & most likely the lease has stipulations within that do not allow violations, so that would be a breaking of the lease.
Another way of saying it, if property insurance rates/coverage could/would be effected, most likely it is not allowed in the lease, on most boilerplate leases... & having a dog that bites, jumps, aggressively goes after people does effect most insurance, so probably would have an effect on the lease.
So no, if the activity is against the county code, the land/dog owner has the liability, & most likely the lease has stipulations within that do not allow violations, so that would be a breaking of the lease.
Another way of saying it, if property insurance rates/coverage could/would be effected, most likely it is not allowed in the lease, on most boilerplate leases... & having a dog that bites, jumps, aggressively goes after people does effect most insurance, so probably would have an effect on the lease.