Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Teacher contract vote
#8
FYI:

The state publicly rejected an offer from the teachers union Friday, saying it could not "responsibly accept" a proposal that it estimated would cost taxpayers $1 billion over four years.

"It's obvious there is more work to do to reach a resolution," Schools Superintendent Kathryn Mata­yo­shi said in a news release.


http://www.staradvertiser.com/s?action=login&f=y&id=188469561

IMO, the State needs to resolve this STAT! Teachers deserve fair wages and benefits! For crying out loud, they are also "on the front line". Disgusting.

BTW, what benefit is the union if they cannot represent our teachers and get results? Are the union reps taking a pay cut? (Rhetoric question). UGH.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Teacher contract vote - by csgray - 05-18-2012, 07:30 AM
RE: Teacher contract vote - by dmbwest - 05-18-2012, 07:41 AM
RE: Teacher contract vote - by opihikao - 05-18-2012, 04:06 PM
RE: Teacher contract vote - by opihikao - 05-19-2012, 08:48 AM
RE: Teacher contract vote - by opihikao - 05-19-2012, 08:54 AM
RE: Teacher contract vote - by pslamont - 05-20-2012, 06:39 PM
RE: Teacher contract vote - by bystander - 05-21-2012, 01:33 AM
RE: Teacher contract vote - by opihikao - 01-26-2013, 04:15 AM
RE: Teacher contract vote - by kalakoa - 01-26-2013, 09:00 AM
RE: Teacher contract vote - by opihikao - 03-25-2013, 03:19 AM
RE: Teacher contract vote - by unknownjulie - 03-25-2013, 04:15 AM
RE: Teacher contract vote - by opihikao - 04-17-2013, 03:46 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 7 Guest(s)