08-13-2013, 07:56 AM
reads like double speak to me - kind of thing the coal lobby used to produce
just the stats facts please- not speculation - lets start with failure rates and required liability insurance premiums to cover the losses to east Hawaii if it blows - worst case scenario planning not best case planning - being the accepted practice.
See fukashima - still leaking radiation and now the Country of Japan is paying to freeze the ground to prevent leaks - Topco the owner of the plant out of cash
If the japanese got blindsided - what would lead one to believe an outside manufacturer and conglomerate will be able to protect Puna in a worst case scenario?
The Germans replaced 20 nukes with solar - since Fukashima a little over 2 years.....would power all of Hawaii - even your coveted high speed rail.... safely - thats fact #1 one
Hydrogen sulfide nasty erosive stuff that can kill - another fact
large scale solar proven and cost efficient - more facts
geothermal an experimental technology that will generate huge profits for speculators getting in at the ground floor and using Puna Geo as a n experiment to prove its safety - on the backs of the locals
At the least the financial rewards should go to those at risk - not a bunch of start up risk takers and carpetbaggers from off island
Iceland where they dont have any sun has no solar option - we dont need their options at latitude 20 where every square meter of roof can generate 3kw per day safely.......
The extreme solar radiation at our latitude is like free risk free money - free energy on the roof all around and we would rather take a risk on a thermal blow out - havent convinced me yet in spite of all the flowery words and upbeat propaganda...... just the facts please - usually associated with verifiable statistics and "numbers" as my dr calls real world data.....
just the stats facts please- not speculation - lets start with failure rates and required liability insurance premiums to cover the losses to east Hawaii if it blows - worst case scenario planning not best case planning - being the accepted practice.
See fukashima - still leaking radiation and now the Country of Japan is paying to freeze the ground to prevent leaks - Topco the owner of the plant out of cash
If the japanese got blindsided - what would lead one to believe an outside manufacturer and conglomerate will be able to protect Puna in a worst case scenario?
The Germans replaced 20 nukes with solar - since Fukashima a little over 2 years.....would power all of Hawaii - even your coveted high speed rail.... safely - thats fact #1 one
Hydrogen sulfide nasty erosive stuff that can kill - another fact
large scale solar proven and cost efficient - more facts
geothermal an experimental technology that will generate huge profits for speculators getting in at the ground floor and using Puna Geo as a n experiment to prove its safety - on the backs of the locals
At the least the financial rewards should go to those at risk - not a bunch of start up risk takers and carpetbaggers from off island
Iceland where they dont have any sun has no solar option - we dont need their options at latitude 20 where every square meter of roof can generate 3kw per day safely.......
The extreme solar radiation at our latitude is like free risk free money - free energy on the roof all around and we would rather take a risk on a thermal blow out - havent convinced me yet in spite of all the flowery words and upbeat propaganda...... just the facts please - usually associated with verifiable statistics and "numbers" as my dr calls real world data.....