Sen Ruderman, where is the proof

[TomK]

quote:

---

Originally posted by Wao nahele kane
ETA:
Here's an example of an independent scientific study that determines if a GM crop is safe or not for biological consumption. It's known as a "long term toxicological study".
http://www.organic-systems.org/journal/81/8106.pdf

---

Here's a small collection of some peer review of that paper from some independent, er, "peers":

http://www.biotech-now.org/food-and-agri...ralini-2-0#

I'm no biologist or geneticist, but can certainly see where that paper comes into the "junk science" category both in its statistical analysis and in its so-called use of the scientific method. If this is an example of what you think is a scientific study, then you have a lot to learn.

In the meantime, you might want to spend some time telling us what is or is not wrong with the studies you can read via here:

http://50.62.76.192/genera/guide/

That link also allows you to provide studies that may show GMOs are unsafe. I hope you have a fun time with that as it seems to be what you are asking for.