03-17-2014, 07:48 AM
quote:
If anyone has a legitimate question about the bill I will try to answer them.
If the bill leverages the existing "Special Use" process, there is effectively no end-run around County authority, which suggests that the existing SUP process will keep these uses from "suddenly moving in next door" (if they are allowed to happen at all).
County's posture seems to be "we encourage people to follow the process, but we're not really going to approve anything". How does this promote sustainability?
Opinion: upon reading the bill, my first thought was "Hmm -- this could be used to create a sustainability model as an art installation for the tourists to visit, probably in the side yard of an art gallery in Volcano." It's really not much help otherwise.