04-27-2014, 05:46 AM
"The development of this device should be much, much cheaper than relabeling hundreds of thousands of food items. And it would certainly be profitable for that fortunate soul who brought the device to market."
I dont agree - I do agree however there are very inexpensive ways to solve the problem - cereal makers already responding to market forces by labeling "non gmo" on the boxes
If its about the cheapest way to accomplish a goal - easy peasy
getting past the monsanto power structure and tea party types - not so easy
it may be helpful to frame this issue in the fact that in most of the world - this is a done deal and not controversial - uniquely our hang up..... we label our gmo exports however - the japanese know what they are eating.....
Manana
I dont agree - I do agree however there are very inexpensive ways to solve the problem - cereal makers already responding to market forces by labeling "non gmo" on the boxes
If its about the cheapest way to accomplish a goal - easy peasy
getting past the monsanto power structure and tea party types - not so easy
it may be helpful to frame this issue in the fact that in most of the world - this is a done deal and not controversial - uniquely our hang up..... we label our gmo exports however - the japanese know what they are eating.....
Manana