04-27-2014, 07:51 AM
I think you're missing a key point. Its not that the kids were handing out copies out the constitution. They could have been handing out episode scripts of spongebob squarepants or pointers on safe sexual relations. Point is they weren't allowed to hand them out. Not what they were handing out.
In this specific instance the plaintiff was actually handing out copies of the very document that was being infringed.
I feel, almost, as if you are confused over the issue at hand. Its not what was being handed out. Its the restriction of handing something out. Regardless of its content.
Also selling something and handing out phamplets are kind of apples and oranges don't ya thunk?
In this specific instance the plaintiff was actually handing out copies of the very document that was being infringed.
I feel, almost, as if you are confused over the issue at hand. Its not what was being handed out. Its the restriction of handing something out. Regardless of its content.
Also selling something and handing out phamplets are kind of apples and oranges don't ya thunk?